- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,089
- Location
- Swansea
OMG.........................
Think i just wet myself looking in side the jet!!
anyone else worried that the first gameplay footage we've seen is being played with a joypad?
Looks Great! but BF3 Shouldnt have a Singleplayer Campaign
The video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJbTzJD_iwc
I guess that can only depend on who you are and what you believe. Every side is a good guy, every side is an enemy!
I am excited about the SP campaign (even though the SP in BC2 was a joke and I went straight back to MP once I saw how bad it was without getting very far at all), 1)but i would rather they would make a solely multiplayer game and put all their focus into that.
All about the dough though.
Yes it should
1)That is an assumption that is made too often with nothing to back it up that the multi player would be better if there was no SP.
nope I would rather than didn't bother with sp
Cut out SP = more money/resources/man hours going towards MP
Cut out SP = more money/resources/man hours going towards MP
The SP is put in after the MP is finished
Cut out SP = more money/resources/man hours going towards MP
Highly unlikely. They'll have 2 seperate teams working on them simultaneously, but the fact remains that if there was no SP, the team working on it would likely be allocated to the MP, as would the money and production time.
Again no! the time working on the SP would not be put on to the MP they would be put on to another game & as i already said even if that was the case all that would happen is an earlier release.