My own experience is the numbers seem to add up and work reasonably well. I think the more data you can give the software, the better chance it has of getting it more accurate, so not only a HRM, I think more importantly a power meter (if applicable to your exercise). What I think can be inaccurate is the calculators that work out how much your daily allowance is. I've kind of worked that out myself, then do the maths on the activities on top of that.
I think one mistake people make is, you can't include your logged exercise when judging how active you are. So, if I sit at a desk all day and night, I put myself as inactive. If I then start jugging at lunch time every day, which gets tracked in Strava and I get credited with the calories burnt, but I stay sat at the desk all day still, I should leave it as inactive. If I make that more active, I'm getting credited twice with going for a run.This was based on my assessment of my activity level as ‘not very active’. This has previously worked (although not as fast as predicted) when my daily exercise wasn’t more than a leisurely walk.
I’ve now upped my regular activity level. Having done a short stint of cardio which the machine tells me was worth 300 calories, should I now eat 300 more to break even and still lose at the same rate?
also been using a dash of it to sweeten coffee.
Reminds me of the
I think one of the points was it's not always about making yourself sick, it's about maybe binge eating but then going and exercising. Tracking all your calories etc, including those exercised. Was an interesting watch actually.
I'm almost always hungry still.