I'm no lawyer but surely what Chuck was doing can be perceived as entrapment?
Anyone think there was a double bluff going on? Chuck didn't seem all that annoyed about being betrayed/fired and we seem to have not been privy to something in the middle between when Connerty and Dake realised Chuck was doing the right thing (and Dake packing his bags) to them protecting Jock.
Sadly we'll have to wait till next year to find out, I wonder if this paves the way for Chuck to become Axe's compliance officer for a while
he's a top lawyer/former US Attorney, it would be bit of a downgrade - compliance officer is a back office job for plebs like Spyros.
Or he just wanted to quit anywaysAnyone think there was a double bluff going on? Chuck didn't seem all that annoyed about being betrayed/fired and we seem to have not been privy to something in the middle between when Connerty and Dake realised Chuck was doing the right thing (and Dake packing his bags) to them protecting Jock.
This does somewhat undermine Connerty's character and makes his pursuit of Chuck rather hypocritical.
It would seem a bit too much maybe but there is a small nagging feeling in me that this might be the case.
Anyone think there was a double bluff going on? Chuck didn't seem all that annoyed about being betrayed/fired and we seem to have not been privy to something in the middle between when Connerty and Dake realised Chuck was doing the right thing (and Dake packing his bags) to them protecting Jock.
This does somewhat undermine Connerty's character and makes his pursuit of Chuck rather hypocritical.
It would seem a bit too much maybe but there is a small nagging feeling in me that this might be the case.