Bit confused with Bowens ?

The OP's gave himself the reputation right from the get go when he dimissed all the entry level cameras and was considering a D700, eventually settled on a D300 (which to his credit, I think he took the advice on here and got that to save a bit of money).

Now, the problem, or the pressure of telling people you have a semi pro body is that you are expected to get shots that warrant the purchase of camera of such calibre. There is obviously a "honeymoon period" where if you are new, like you are, that you can post "crap" images. However, the shots you posted were not just crap in my opinion, they were more to do with your inability to see the fault in them. Faults that was blatantly obvious to everyone else.

1 - Sharpness and focusing

They are often out, for me, they go into the bin

2 - Exposure

Yours are usually under exposed, often by half a stop or more, again, either fix it or bin it.

I won't even go into composition, or being creative, as those will come later, but the first 2 the camera basically does it for you automatically. So there is no excuses not to get them right, and no excuses to not to spot them. The fact that you either can spot them and still posted them worries me.

Also, you seem to do weird PS processing, that Vegas sigh that Derek took…god knows what you did with that and god knows why you thought it was better. You made it worse and thought it was better. It isn't gear that was holding you back, there is a logic of thought and preception of what is right and wrong that you need to change…..

The OTHER side of the OP that irrates me is attitude.

Be modest, humble and grateful.

No one stops learning, LISTEN to advice, don't blame your gear or others.

At the moment your gear is capable much more of what you can do with it. Don't buy a single thing until it limits you. And if you want to know what those are:-

1 - Light - do you find yourself shooting at silly low light situations like in a dark church but forbidden to use flash. And find yourself in that situation in a regular basis?
2 - Speed - Do you need to shoot at silly shutter speed like at a motorcross? (btw, your D300 can do this MORE than fine), which btw, it is also to do with light in a way.


If I were in your shoes, do the following.

Take more pictures.
Stop reading gear reviews.
 
I was in a situation the other day where i was trying to take sharp pictures in low light, having listened to people on here i stuck with DX so my camera is only good upto ISO1600, flash wouldnt have produced the right picture, and a D3S would have been very handy.

OK, but people dealt with those circumstances 5 years ago with the D2x and it's high ISO performance was on balance worse than the D300s. Indeed they dealt with them 20 years ago with film. The latest and greatest is fine if you absolutely need to make those shots first time with the minimum of effort for serious commercial reasons but I'm guessing you don't have that pressure.

There are always going to be shots you can't take with today's kit, in 5 or 10 years when sensors with massive dynamic range turn up people will wonder how we managed without and laugh at the idea of HDR blending in processing. Adapting and solving those problems without £5k of kit will make you better for it, shooting at ISO 6400 with a D3s won't. Don't fall into that trap.
 
The OP's gave himself the reputation right from the get go when he dimissed all the entry level cameras and was considering a D700, eventually settled on a D300 (which to his credit, I think he took the advice on here and got that to save a bit of money).

Now, the problem, or the pressure of telling people you have a semi pro body is that you are expected to get shots that warrant the purchase of camera of such calibre. There is obviously a "honeymoon period" where if you are new, like you are, that you can post "crap" images. However, the shots you posted were not just crap in my opinion, they were more to do with your inability to see the fault in them. Faults that was blatantly obvious to everyone else.

1 - Sharpness and focusing

They are often out, for me, they go into the bin

2 - Exposure

Yours are usually under exposed, often by half a stop or more, again, either fix it or bin it.

I won't even go into composition, or being creative, as those will come later, but the first 2 the camera basically does it for you automatically. So there is no excuses not to get them right, and no excuses to not to spot them. The fact that you either can spot them and still posted them worries me.

Also, you seem to do weird PS processing, that Vegas sigh that Derek took…god knows what you did with that and god knows why you thought it was better. You made it worse and thought it was better. It isn't gear that was holding you back, there is a logic of thought and preception of what is right and wrong that you need to change…..

The OTHER side of the OP that irrates me is attitude.

Be modest, humble and grateful.

No one stops learning, LISTEN to advice, don't blame your gear or others.

At the moment your gear is capable much more of what you can do with it. Don't buy a single thing until it limits you. And if you want to know what those are:-

1 - Light - do you find yourself shooting at silly low light situations like in a dark church but forbidden to use flash. And find yourself in that situation in a regular basis?
2 - Speed - Do you need to shoot at silly shutter speed like at a motorcross? (btw, your D300 can do this MORE than fine), which btw, it is also to do with light in a way.


If I were in your shoes, do the following.

Take more pictures.
Stop reading gear reviews.

Bravo! I agree.

We're all nice people TBL :)
 
I feel we have got to the point where we all understand each other without turning everything into a big arguement. Obviously my attitude gets on peoples nerves, maybe I didnt realise it, maybe I did, at the end of the day we are all here for the same love arent we ?
 
I'll be honest, the only pictures I actually remember seeing of yours are the 'fashion shoot' ones.

I'd be interested to see some of your other stuff though, do you have a Flickr link or another online gallery? Also interested to see the Chase Jarvis tutorial you followed. Do you have a link?

http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/20...y-play-post-production-on-this-popular-photo/

I only have 3 pictures on my flickr I think, as i only post shots up there when i get goodish feedback on here. Quality > quantity, right ?
 
To get back on topic, has anyone had any experience with Innovatronix ? They do a complete speedlight softbox kit that looks a lot more stable than anything available in the UK, like lastolite.. ?

SoftB%20back%20HR.jpg
 
That looks very similar to the one I have. How much is the one you're looking at going for?

They are basically the same as the Lastolite ones, apart from the fact that I think the Lastolite ones have a dual diffuser inside, not sure what difference that makes.

I picked up my 24" one for about £30-40 (can't remember exactly) and it's great for headshots and upper body shots. A bit on the small side for full length shots though if it's your only light source.

PS. Thanks for the Chase Jarvis link. How did yours turn out?
 
Is yours a lastolite ? Im thinking of pulling the trigger as they are relativly cheap but everyone complains about the quality in the reviews. The one I am looking at is $300, but i believe you can use the same equipment on pretty much anything, ie reflectors, umbrellas etc, and not just limited to a particular brand of softbox.

Heres my flickr link btw, as you asked. http://www.flickr.com/photos/statikedout/
 
Is yours a lastolite ? Im thinking of pulling the trigger as they are relativly cheap but everyone complains about the quality in the reviews. The one I am looking at is $300, but i believe you can use the same equipment on pretty much anything, ie reflectors, umbrellas etc, and not just limited to a particular brand of softbox.

Heres my flickr link btw, as you asked. http://www.flickr.com/photos/statikedout/

No, mine is just an unbranded thing. No idea who it is made by. $300 is a ridiculous price if it's the one pictured above. What size is it?

My 24" one, including the bracket, was only around £30-40
 
60cmx60cm, you get the flash head itself too though.
Most flash guns are now equipped with wireless remote control systems that they can also serve as studio flashes. When you are on your home/studio doing serious photography work or just practice shooting, you have to use tons of AAs or rechargeable battery sets if you are going to work for longer hours.​
With the new Tronix SpeedFire - you get away from battery depletion worries. The Tronix SpeedFire powers the flash guns directly through AC power or main/wall socket. It is an external power supply which converts AC power to high voltage DC power that connects to the flash gun's external power port. Since connected directly to AC, your flash gun will recycle faster (in less than 1 sec) and will give unlimited number of flashes.
 
It all sounds a bit crap if I'm honest.

Seems pointless having a flash gun which must be triggered through AC power. Just get yourself a cheap Canon flash, like a 430EZ or something (around £50) and some YongNuo RF-602s (around £30-40).
 
It all sounds a bit crap if I'm honest.

Seems pointless having a flash gun which must be triggered through AC power. Just get yourself a cheap Canon flash, like a 430EZ or something (around £50) and some YongNuo RF-602s (around £30-40).

I agree; just get a setup similar to what anyone else would choose. It would be different if you fully understood exposure (from a practical point of view)and knowing how to balance your Shutter/Aperture and ISO. This is not meant as an insult, but all your shots do tend to be a touch on the dark/blurry/fuzzy side. The initial outlay is tiny for the above and will give you a good starting block on how it all comes together. It also means you have not over complicated your setup allowing you to concentrate on learning the camera side of things. Additionally, any problems are easier to resolve as others will have experience with what you are using. I know you have said a few times about 'buying twice' but to be honest, even if you sold the above once you were done with it you would not have spent much at all really for the experience of getting to know how something works before buying the best and getting in a pickle.
 
I would also say that it would take you quite some time to grow out of a basic speedlite setup. Any strobist shots I have ever posted are with a Canon 430EX, Canon 430EZ, the RF-602 triggers, and some cheap light modifiers.

See:

4395769529_168fe709dc_z.jpg


Lightstand, about £12 each I think
Flashes, 430EX was a bit more, around £120 I think, and in this shot there was a 580EX used (someone elses), but my 430EZ would have been the same
Umbrella, about £10 I think
Triggers and receivers, about £30-40 I think

CHEAP!

4396477982_260519a29c_z.jpg
 
Last edited:
I highly recommend the RF602's!

If you search for 'RF602' on ebay - there is a UK seller selling a set of 2 receivers plus trigger for £42; or 3 for £50. I also use a Yongnuo YN465 flash; I used one in conjunction with a SB600 and the YN465 was excellent given it was a quarter of the price (~£50), very hard to seperate them. You could buy a couple of them at that price, get some receivers, plus the above recommended by SS and all in less than £200 notes for a great little intro into Strobist.

The one thing I am going to really make a point of is to make sure you don't live through other people; work out what is not good enough yourself rather than what you have read or what someone else thinks. Its much better to have an opinion when you speak from experience. Finding this stuff out for yourself will make you a much better photographer!
 
They are basically the same as the Lastolite ones, apart from the fact that I think the Lastolite ones have a dual diffuser inside, not sure what difference that makes.
It gives a little more diffusion and adds an extra degree of flexibility for those tricky subjects. I prefer to shoot with it than without it.

That said, it's not worth the extra expense alone, but the overall quality of the Lastolite stuff is very, very good.
 
Ah right, thanks for confirming. I assumed it did make a positive difference but I wasn't sure how much difference it made. Would love to see some comparison shots with and without the internal diffuser.
 
You may or may not remember my Bowens thread from a week or so back (much cheaper Bowens 400 kit), I'm giving the lastolite 60x60cm a trial on hopes I won't need to resort to Bowens, so I may also be able to oblige in a few days. Cheap is good, as long as it works. If it doesn't it'll be up for sale and I'll get something bigger/more powerful...baby project, I want to get it right and there's no substitute for big diffuse light!
 
Back
Top Bottom