Bladerunner 2 (Spoilers!)

Basically, everything the daughter says about herself is fake - created by Deckard etc to hide the truth of who she is. Remember she grew up as a human boy in an orphanage, she didn't have parents to leave her behind when they went off-world.

Not necessarily true. She more likely grew up as a girl in the orphanage, but when she made that memory and gave it to K, she turned the gender to a boy

Also it's plausable she was adopted and was going to be taken off world by her new parents, but got an issue with her immune system like she said....could even be as a result of being a replicants child.
 
Not necessarily true. She more likely grew up as a girl in the orphanage, but when she made that memory and gave it to K, she turned the gender to a boy

Also it's plausable she was adopted and was going to be taken off world by her new parents, but got an issue with her immune system like she said....could even be as a result of being a replicants child.
No, she was expressly dressed as a boy (Deckard confirms this) so that if anyone went looking for the child in the future they would be looking for a male.

The genetic disorder was one of a human child - completely different genome to a replicant, again to throw off the scent of anyone looking for a replicant. When K is looking at DNA records they are human records - a replicant would stand out like a sore thumb.
 
Probably not, CGI costs a fortune.

Something like Captain America: Civil War cost $250 million, though obviously the cost of their cast (particularly RDJ) is considerably higher.
 
reading all these spoilers makes me think i'm stupid, i dont get half the theories etc having said that it usually takes me a few watches to pick up all the plot lines.
anyway i seen this friday last week and was blown away. i thought it was a 2hr film, must have misread the running time! some amazing set pieces and visuals
the soundtrack was excellent and familiar
might try get to see it again in the cinema, if not will be a good one at home too on bluray
 
With preparation to watching Blade Runner 2 in the cinema soon I have watched Blade Runner 1, well the movie is well ahead of it's time. Really enjoyed watching it and really looking forward to watching BR 2.
 
I've lost count the amount of times I've seen BR2019 (should we be calling it that now?) - twice in the past month alone. And every time I find it such a transporting experience into that world. Seeing it on the big screen at Vue prior to seeing 2049 was something I never thought I'd experience and it has aged so well, especially thanks to the DC/FC enhancements. Also best sounding movie ever, the music, sound effects and ambient sounds are just top notch.
 
Did a back to back yesterday of Blade Runner Final Cut at home and Blade Runner 2049 in my local cinema.

:eek:

Excellent way to spend a long afternoon.
 
nice - new definition for an afternoon.

Did the 4k disc release of original correspond to a new digital copy for cinemas too ? (so should I be reading small print at cinema)
 
Basically, everything the daughter says about herself is fake - created by Deckard etc to hide the truth of who she is. Remember she grew up as a human boy in an orphanage, she didn't have parents to leave her behind when they went off-world.

It seemed real enough for Wallace to get his enforcer to shadow K in his quest to find Deckard to she could capture him for questioning and possible torture
 
It seemed real enough for Wallace to get his enforcer to shadow K in his quest to find Deckard to she could capture him for questioning and possible torture
Well, yes only a few replicants know the truth and the viewer only finds out later.
 
this was an interesting production comment

Blade Runner 2049 is slated for theatrical release on October 6th and I am looking forward to it with reservations. I wish Roger Deakins had used anamorphic as it’s so much a part of Blade Runner universe. There are various shots in the new film that really don’t have any character… Case in point below…

( see http://www.red.com/learn/red-101/anamorphic-lenses#im3 )

here too
Just some of my favorite films for anamorphic photography (skipping 65mm movies, Techniscope, Super-35 for the moment):
Any Kurosawa anamorphic movie (Hidden Fortress, Yojimbo, Red Beard, High & Low, Bad Sleep Well, Sanjuro) Dr. Zhivago, Bridge on the River Kwai
Apocalypse Now
Blade Runner, Alien
Superman: The Movie
A Bridge Too Far
JFK, Snow Falling on Cedars
Raiders of the Lost Ark, Close Encounters
Thin Red Line, The New World
Heat
The Elephant Man

- need some folks from photography forum to comment.
could he not use the same lense type because of 3d or cgi concerns



Have they decided whether the 4K uhd disc will have the widescreen 2.39:1 version ?
 
I have quite a lot to say on this (but I don't have much time so I'll keep it short) - was a lot stronger than I was expecting!

The characters, acting, visuals and sound were absolutely top notch. From what I could tell it opted for 'physical things' rather than CGI a lot of the time and that really paid dividends. Where CGI / specifically effects were used, as it was for the lead's holographic partner, or the glitching Elvis - which were fantastic.

The plot was also excellent although the first scene was very predictable. I became very intrigued when the suitcase was opened and was then impressed with both the first twist and the subsequent reversal of that twist.

The were a few niggles for me which I'm not letting spoil my enjoyment:

The 'prostitutes' were told to speak to the 'man in the green jacket' - wut!! Green?! Hmm greenish dark blue maybe but that was anything but a 'green' jacket :p

The DNA sequencing scene was lol - perhaps it wasn't in 'real time' but he really didn't look at much DNA to decide that two individuals were identical!

More seriously, I didn't understand why they didn't kill K after they captured Decard, and I didn't understand why they put Decard in a car and drove him somewhere (i.e. leading up to the ocean battle). Perhaps some lines of dialogue got cut out to explain this? They really should have expressly explained those points. Anyone can feel free to explain to me :)

The biggest drawback for most people was it's duration - 2 hours 45ish is really long for a relatively slow film with long scenes without dialogue. Despite me typically taking marks off for films that are too long, it wasn't much of a problem for me, although I expected it would end several times before it actually did. Some people coming out of the cinema immediately complained at its length. Personally, I thought it could have ended shortly after Decard got taken away, with a little bit of editing to tidy up loose ends, but it went on for perhaps half an hour more than that and I actually started to wonder at that point just how long I'd been in the cinema.

My rating - 8.5 (may go up or down upon my next viewing)
Company's rating - 8
 
I guess the reason they didn't kill K was because... movies? It's just one of those things I guess. Protagonist needs to finish his arc, unless anyone else can think of a valid reason as to why they left him alive?

I just assumed that part in the hover car was the transport to the craft that would take him off world. It's never specifically stated why Wallace has to do this. I just assumed it's because torture isn't policed quite so vigorously off world.
 
I guess the reason they didn't kill K was because... movies? It's just one of those things I guess. Protagonist needs to finish his arc, unless anyone else can think of a valid reason as to why they left him alive?

I just assumed that part in the hover car was the transport to the craft that would take him off world. It's never specifically stated why Wallace has to do this. I just assumed it's because torture isn't policed quite so vigorously off world.
how did u get the impression that this person is alive? i think itas pretty obvious that person is not alive anymore
 
Back
Top Bottom