So with holding information on the bombing of Pearl Harbour was okay? thouhg it was needed to get the yanks involved I don't consider it honourable conduct tbh.Originally posted by Clerkin
WE WERE AT WAR.
So with holding information on the bombing of Pearl Harbour was okay? thouhg it was needed to get the yanks involved I don't consider it honourable conduct tbh.Originally posted by Clerkin
WE WERE AT WAR.
Originally posted by dirtydog
Search works for everyone now, try it
Originally posted by Clerkin
are u anti-britain or pro nazi?
Originally posted by Clerkin
I aint trying to be rude, some of yor comments to me seem anti British.
Please explain how you are a Patriot.
Originally posted by elbows
Churchill was one of those people who was awful but happened to be the right man for the job at a certain point in history. I can hardly be in awe of Churchill considering he made some comment about "I can see no problem with gassing uncivilised tribes" (In relation to Afghanistan or Iraq I forget which, funny how history repeats eh). On the other hand its quite plausible that without Churchill around during the outbreak of WW2, we might have gone down the total appeaser route and given up. Enough powerful people favoured that option, obviously Churchill wasnt the only one who didnt but he had the right git of a personality to deal with such a bad situation.
Anyway, Blair has busted a gut fighting his impossible position, wow the number of times he must have squirmed at American diplomatic stupidity, I bet Rumsfelds name is muck round these parts. If the medal is for perseverence in diplomacy and spin and selling a war in the constant face of unprecedented oposition, he deserves it.
Its always been my belief that the harder option for Blair and Britain to take would have been oposing or at least not aiding US war plans, there are many reasons for this.
Funnily enough I think that its true that Blair has tried to act in the nations interests, and that this is true whether you are pro or anti war. If you are pro war you believe the stated morally justified reasaons for the war, and if you are cynical like me you suspect that we didnt really have too much choice, all things considered, and seeing the oh so subtle Bush administration style I dont think they are above threats.
Blair getting the award will also give those who accuse him of being a poodle more ammunition
Well whether you love or hate Blair or just dont care, the signs are he's in for a contiued rough ride. Will the post-war squabbles over who runs Iraq etc cause the bags under his eyes to reach the same state as they did during the death of the UN diplomatic route for 2nd resolution? Stay tuned.
Originally posted by Hellsmk2
Like it or not, Churchill did some absolutely deplorable things. Going back to your "WE WERE AT WAR" comment as well, does that mean that the holocaust was justified? Germany was at war too....
Originally posted by KaTyM609
They thought they were justified in doing it .... we thought we were justified in doing what we did....
We won... so we were justified in doing it and they were not!
Originally posted by dirtydog
So in war, as long as you are the final victor, anything goes? Is that what you're saying?
Originally posted by silverpaw
So with holding information on the bombing of Pearl Harbour was okay? thouhg it was needed to get the yanks involved I don't consider it honourable conduct tbh.
Originally posted by Clerkin
Simple as...
Churchill didnt start WW2 - he ended it.
Originally posted by iam
Looks like we'll all be having flawed logic for tea
But back OT, I do think Blair deserves it
Originally posted by cousin_itt
they should take all the iraqi childrens' severed limbs, put a piece of string through them and put that round blairs neck.