Boomerang Generation

I think to say that people overspend these days is a little unfair. These are things (broadband, phone, car) which are probably on the poverty list if you dont have them.

Compare to your nan and grandads generation.

No phones.
No computers.
Tv? three channels maybe?
No automatic washing machines.
Woman stayed at home to bring up kids most likely.
No long distance commutes.
Go to work, come home, eat and sleep. Pub on a friday. Paid weekly in cash. That was their life.
Holiday was a coach trip to blackpool.
Safe to send your kid to go play in the street. It didnt matter what trainers they had. holes in clothes didnt matter.
Didnt need brand name prams and car seats.
Huge inter war and post war housebuilding programme.

House cost £10k or they got a council house. Yeah wages were lower but their life was as i described.

Take a look at what you could really do without these days if you have a job and a commute and want to do more than rot in your bedroom for 10+ years.

Exactly, simpler, cheaper times. The problem with preaching to those not 'on the ladder' to cut back on frivolities and scrimp and save for a deposit is that modern life makes it extremely tough to do so; there is a social (media) pressure to be keeping up with those who are much more spendthrift and careless with their money - the always out partying, on holiday, latest iDevice, car on PCP generation. If you try and cut back to try and save any meaningful amount as a deposit, you can end up sitting at home with few friends and little enjoyment in life.
 
I think to say that people overspend these days is a little unfair. These are things (broadband, phone, car) which are probably on the poverty list if you dont have them.

Compare to your nan and grandads generation.

No phones.
No computers.
Tv? three channels maybe?
No automatic washing machines.
Woman stayed at home to bring up kids most likely.
No long distance commutes.
Go to work, come home, eat and sleep. Pub on a friday. Paid weekly in cash. That was their life.
Holiday was a coach trip to blackpool.
Safe to send your kid to go play in the street. It didnt matter what trainers they had. holes in clothes didnt matter.
Didnt need brand name prams and car seats.
Huge inter war and post war housebuilding programme.

House cost £10k or they got a council house. Yeah wages were lower but their life was as i described.

Take a look at what you could really do without these days if you have a job and a commute and want to do more than rot in your bedroom for 10+ years.


You are missing a very big part of the picture.

On top of all that. Population has grown significant ly since the 1960's and at the same time the rate for extended households has fallen.

Back in the 60's it was perfectly normal to have in-laws/grand parents living in the same home.

In my childhood, everybody I knew had grandparents living with them. One household even had a great-grand mother living there.

No need for expensive social care and nursing home back then. Families looked after one another rather than relying on the state.

And housing was used far more efficiently.

Of course a combination of growing population and a shift to single living is going to put massive pressure on the availability of housing.
 
10k was exactly the price my dad paid for his north London house in 1979. 40 years later it’s worth £1.4m. I am pretty sure wages haven’t increased that much lol!

London house prices are mental. My old house in E18 was purchased for £71K in 1994 and sold for £715K last September.

The 3 bed detached house in NE Herts I grew up in cost my dad £6K in 1969 and is worth around £450K now. Still a huge increase but not 100% in 25 years...
 
Same even up North to a lesser degree. Here is something depressing, ask your parents what they paid for their house and then use this inflation calculator to see how much they would have paid now.

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator

I've said this before but I grew up in a 4 bed detached house with my Dad running a small business and my mum helping him part time. They left school at 16 with no qualifications. My wife and I are both university graduates her a Teacher and me an IT professional. There is no way we could afford to live in the house I grew up in.

We paid 230k for a small 3 bed semi in 2013 my mum and dad paid the equivalent of 173k for 4 bed detached in 1983. They made sacrifices for that house, but to buy now would be well over half a million. Based on my parents qualifications and occupations they would be struggling to afford a flat if they were starting out now.

Using that calculator for the 4 bed detached house my parents bought in 1992 @ 119K (in a suburb or Cambridge) reveals that today's inflation-affected price is 248K; instead another house in the same cul-de-sac sold recently for 800K. No way wages have kept pace with that...
 
Last edited:
Just noticed one of the houses on my road sold for 28K in 1996 and near 180K in 2010! someone was probably laughing all the way to the bank on that one.
 
It's undoubtedly harder to get on the housing ladder today than in the last couple of generations. But that said, having read this specific son's comments and actions I feel 23 years old is probably not too late for an abortion.

We bought our own house when I was 23 so only 10 years ago in the peak of recession where 25% deposit was the norm. We put down 36k deposit and will be mortgage free by 40. At the time we both worked average jobs but did lots of overtime/nights. Everyone around you is in flash cars and the latest mobile phones but are then gobsmacked when they come to your home for a BBQ and ask how you can afford this. I guess people just have different priorities. I am now an area manager on a decent wage but still see people on higher salaries a lot worse off than me because they blow it on booze and fags.
 
Just noticed one of the houses on my road sold for 28K in 1996 and near 180K in 2010! someone was probably laughing all the way to the bank on that one.

Except no one wins because the trade up cost is higher too.

My nan rented off the council in the same house for over 60 years. She couldnt even afford to right to buy it for what was probably a couple grand in the 80's or whenever that scheme came in. She died in 02, but a few years ago her house was on the market for £150k.
 
What everybody forgets in these sorts of discussion is that the price of housing isnt determined by the availability of the houses. It is determined by the availability of Money.

If we went back to the days when it was not generally possible to get a mortgage on anything other than new builds (And this really wasn't that long ago) then the price of housing would plummet to the point where most people would be able to exchange contracts for the price of an envelope full of cash. (Which is how it was done)
 
Is the the bi-monthly 'lazy young uns don't know how lucky they are / housing is expensive' thread?
Don't forget 'They should move to a rat hole like I did and be miserable online because they don't know anyone within 50 miles.'
 
What everybody forgets in these sorts of discussion is that the price of housing isnt determined by the availability of the houses. It is determined by the availability of Money.

If we went back to the days when it was not generally possible to get a mortgage on anything other than new builds (And this really wasn't that long ago) then the price of housing would plummet to the point where most people would be able to exchange contracts for the price of an envelope full of cash. (Which is how it was done)

I don't think it is either - the housing market doesn't behave exactly like or as tied as other commodity markets to supply and demand in quite the same way or it would have gone through quite a crash by now. End of the day people need a roof over their heads so the choice of going without isn't possible to exercise in quite the same way.
 
I don't think it is either - the housing market doesn't behave exactly like or as tied as other commodity markets to supply and demand in quite the same way or it would have gone through quite a crash by now. End of the day people need a roof over their heads so the choice of going without isn't possible to exercise in quite the same way.


The other thing about the housing market is (With the exception of new builds of course) it is a swap market. (There is probabally an economic term for this)

IE it is not like a factory turning out I-pads.

For each person to buy a house somebody else needs to sell one, and probably buy another one for themselves.

In some cases many parties might be involved (The chain scenario)

This also makes things very difficult,

Stamp duty is a big bind too. In my case it really is making the difference between being able to move and not. :(
 
Stamp Duty stops people downsizing. All those old people hogging the family homes aren't doing it for no reason.

Agreed. There's this, deterring older people from downsizing, and the near complete lack of housing that's aimed at the retired generation. Single floor housing with fewer bedrooms but still good living space. Few bungalows of this specification are built these days, as there's so much more profit in adding another one or two floors.
 
Don't forget 'They should move to a rat hole like I did and be miserable online because they don't know anyone within 50 miles.'
Sounds better than 'Rather than do anything to change my situation I'll take the lifestyle choice to live with my parents for the rest of my life and be miserable online and moan about how hard things are' :D
 
Back
Top Bottom