BRSK

Latest published results shows that Community Fibre lost £140m last year, you can’t use their 3Gb pricing to determine that anybody who is more expensive per gigabit is therefore bad value for money, because the company won’t exist if that continues.
 
Latest published results shows that Community Fibre lost £140m last year, you can’t use their 3Gb pricing to determine that anybody who is more expensive per gigabit is therefore bad value for money, because the company won’t exist if that continues.

So if CF and BRSK were in the same area and you had a network at home that could accommodate the speed:

CF offered 3Gb for £56
BRSK offered 2Gb for £55

Which one would you go for?

its a no brainer.
 
That's a different argument though. The existence of a 3Gb service for £56 in London doesn't mean all other ISP packages that are more expensive than £18.66 per gigabit suddenly become bad value for money, it just means they are not the cheapest. If someone is convinced that they *need* a 2Gbps+ symmetric internet connection then £55 is good value for money.

YouFibre will give you 8Gbps for £99.99, does that make Community Fibre's 3Gb product poor value for money?
 
Last edited:
So if CF and BRSK were in the same area and you had a network at home that could accommodate the speed:

CF offered 3Gb for £56
BRSK offered 2Gb for £55

Which one would you go for?

its a no brainer.
BRSK

they called me to tell me the interweb was going to go down for a few hours for maintence :cry:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom