Can't figure this abstract thinking question out!

[GravyMonster]

I'd say C.

There probably is no right answer, just each different answer shows that you're more logical/analytical/a murderer.

 

[Davies_M]

I'll go for C

2 four sided
2 five sided
so 2 three sided

2 doubles
so 2 singles...
but then that leaves a quad and a 5...

 

[dienamite]

You see the sun in the bottom box? Then in the third bottom box it zooms out to show several suns? Well B has stars zoomed out even more. Imagine yourself zooming away from the first sun to get the idea.

It's B

 

[Gackt]

Imageshack is blocked here, so I have no f'ing clue what is going on.

Don't worry, even if it was unblocked, you'd be in the same place.

 

[mistercrabb]

It's either B or C. I'm going with C, it seems more likely to me (I'm mostly looking at alternate squares, and trying to spot short patterns)

Also notice that the bottom row goes 1 object, 5 objects, 1 object if you choose C.

 

[GhostlyPea]

D IMO

- Pea0n

 

[Strife212]

It's probably B, Keeps symmetry on the bottom pattern and keeps the top pattern alternating.

 

[mistercrabb]

It's probably B, Keeps symmetry on the bottom pattern and keeps the top pattern alternating.

I thought this but then the number of items at the bottom isnt a pattern (1,5,5) and the shading doesnt alternate like it would with C.

 

[w3bbo]

B

2x2=4
1x5=5

 

[Nymins]

I picked B because the bottom row was star > shape > star > shape > "blank" (B has stars) etc.

Makes no sense, but its just what springed into my mind.

 

[w3bbo]

Still going with B

2 object times 2 objects = 4 objects
1 object times 5 objects = 5 objects

Dunno what the pattern is with the geometric shapes tho. Top could be 4+4=8 but then using +doesn't work for the bottom row which is where me theory falls down.

My head hurts

 

[Castiel]

D. when are we gonna get the right answer.

 

[The Halk]

I hope this doesn't turn out to be one of those debunked pseudoscientific psychological profiling things.

 

[Vonhelmet]

It looks like a load of rubbish to me.

Has anyone tried uploading it to Tineye, to see if there's any similar pictures out there? Someone else might have solved it.

 

[Castiel]

It looks like a load of rubbish to me.

Has anyone tried uploading it to Tineye, to see if there's any similar pictures out there? Someone else might have solved it.

No results on tineye. I suspect that you are correct and it is a load of pseudopsychobabble.

 

[mistercrabb]

No results on tineye. I suspect that you are correct and it is a load of pseudopsychobabble.

Or maybe it's a load of random shapes and this is just one big troll?

 

[Gammawolf]

Or maybe it's a load of random shapes and this is just one big troll?

I can assure you it's not a troll unless Intel are into trolling their candidates ^^. I only saw two of the questions the other one was very easy to solve so i didn't post it but might as well share anyway.

 

[apeZ]

D, I presume?

 

[AGD]

For the dots question, the obvious answer is d but the thing about these images is that they do not provide enough information to be sure of the answer. The only answer which does not seem to be plausible is c because it involves no movement. The others are all plausible answers though if you simply assume that the black and white dot are traversing the square's perimeter in opposite directions.

There is no "correct" answer.

 

[Holliday]

I'd say E for the dot one.

The black dot seems to move about two thirds the length of a side clockwise around the square each move, and the white dot seems to move one quarter length of a side anti clockwise each move.