Capital One Cup Semi-Final - 8/9/22/23 January *** Spoilers ***

Oh that's ok then..... :confused:

I'm just saying he isn't a 10-12 year old kid. At the younger age you might think it is funny to time waste but at the older age it's being a little ****. He also tweeted saying he would time waste. No excuse for Hazzard to kick him though.
 
what a complete joke this sport is fast becoming. i can't see how anyone can say hazard isn't in the wrong there. it's quite appauling. ''oh but it's the passion of the game''. no it's not, it's assault and shows zero class. the ball boy isn't innocent but what hazard did is unacceptable.

nice to see a fan clapping the situation too :rolleyes:
 
Chelsea's official Twitter:

Chelsea FC ‏@chelseafc

Has football gone mad? Hazard is sent off for kicking the ball under a ball boy attempting to smother the ball rather than return it. #CFC

:p
 
Injury Lawyers 4 U will be straight on the case, "had an injury at work? Not your fault?" "Was there an unknown Hazard?"
 
foinca0.png


The knob!
 
Oh that's ok then..... :confused:

Well giving a 16 year chav a little kick isn't the same as smashing a innocent 5 year old in the face.

If Hazard kicked him intentionally and wasn't just trying to kick the ball from underneath him then he deserved to be sent off. It's not like he booted him full pelt in the ribs though and the kid openly admitted to what he was going to do before the game. I don't have much sympathy for him.
 
Well giving a 16 year chav a little kick isn't the same as smashing a innocent 5 year old in the face.

If Hazard kicked him intentionally and wasn't just trying to kick the ball from underneath him then he deserved to be sent off. It's not like he booted him full pelt in the ribs though and the kid openly admitted to what he was going to do before the game. I don't have much sympathy for him.

I wonder if your reaction, or the reaction of others would have been the same had that been a Liverpool ball boy :p.
 
Back
Top Bottom