Car accident

Soldato
Joined
2 Dec 2004
Posts
13,999
Location
Under The Desk, Wales
Had call sat morning from police. A guy had crashed his car into mine and another while mine was parked in the street in a parking bay.

Went to see it. Guy and police there. Back of my car smashed on right hand side, light, bumper torn off partially, underside squashed, side panel dented.

Now, guy was driving a mobility vehicle and he said he blacked out.

Police took breath test, negative. No charges etc.

Took all details.

I rang his insurance and they said if he had a blackout he not / they not liable!!

They said i may have to claim through my insurance!!!! Cant believe that.

Have to wait now to see what his insurance say as he not contacted them yet about the incident.

Anyone been through this type of incident?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2004
Posts
5,223
Location
location, location
I've not been through similar, but what his insurance is telling you sounds like total BS.

Talk to your insurance company (you have to anyway) and just give it to them to pursue. This is what your insurance is for.

Good luck!
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Oct 2002
Posts
14,180
Location
Bucks and Edinburgh
I can see that someone blacking out is not fit to hold a driving licence and if that was the case, their insurance should be voided but they should still have to pay up for any third party liability I would have thought.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Aug 2015
Posts
7,064
@koolpc - sounds like BS to me in terms of him not being liable. Maybe they meant his insurance would not be valid? In either case I would have thought you would have a civil legal claim against him for property damage (ask a solicitor obvs). If nobody was liable after blacking out you could use that excuse for anything!
 
Soldato
Joined
22 May 2007
Posts
3,164
Driving is a privilege not a right, I know someone who can’t drive because they’ve got cerebral palsy and another who suffers from epilepsy but strangely was allowed to sail his boat.

He’s gone now, we think he had a fit and drowned while he was on his boat.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Jul 2009
Posts
5,016
Location
Manchester
I would expect his insurance to be null and void - he was unfit to drive due to medical reasons.
I suspect you might be on your own with this.

He could face criminal charges, but probably not if it never happened before.
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,427
Location
Wilds of suffolk
I would expect his insurance to be null and void - he was unfit to drive due to medical reasons.
I suspect you might be on your own with this.

He could face criminal charges, but probably not if it never happened before.

UK based insurers have to act for 3rd parties if they insure the vehicle under the RTA.
They can void a policy and avoid the 3rd party if for example the 3rd party was partly to blame (say a knock for knock) but under most circumstances they have to deal with it and they have to seek reimbursement from the "insured".
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Jul 2009
Posts
5,016
Location
Manchester
UK based insurers have to act for 3rd parties if they insure the vehicle under the RTA.
They can void a policy and avoid the 3rd party if for example the 3rd party was partly to blame (say a knock for knock) but under most circumstances they have to deal with it and they have to seek reimbursement from the "insured".

I’ve just been reading.
Even changing your job mid term can invalidate your insurance.
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,427
Location
Wilds of suffolk
I’ve just been reading.
Even changing your job mid term can invalidate your insurance.

Yes as the policy holder
As I said the insurer is forced (part of being accepted to be allowed to write policies) to act under the RTA.
An insurer is forced to still put the 3rd party into a position as if the policy holder was still insured.

Edit, here you go
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTA_Insurer
 
Back
Top Bottom