fatiain said:
Chip and PIN sucks, it's NOT secure at all. Shoulder surfing anyone?
Banks. Try putting pictures on cards you dolts. Ends 80% of CC fraud.
Or maybe they don't *want* that....
</conspiracy theory>
Do you have any idea how much banks spend on employing people to deal with fraud? The staffing numbers for a major bank are probably well into the hundreds, if not higher still, just for fraud.
Chip and Pin is a LOT more secure than signing. One thing it cuts down is opportunistic fraud. In order to "shoulder surf", there has to be a) someone close behind the cardholder at a till/ATM, b) a cardholder stupid enough to not cover their PIN as they key it, c) the opportunity to remove the card from the cardholder and finally, d) the cardholder not calling their bank immediately to report the card stolen.
Using chip and pin (correctly) makes it pointless for random bag/purse thefts, as the card becomes completely useless without a PIN.
As far as photo cards go, my branch told me that they were removed because it was found that Chip and Pin was more effective at preventing fraud. As has already been said, it's just not an accurate enough representation.
SB118, if you need to use your wifes account, why don't you get a card on it, or ask her to give you cash? You do realise that wife or not, it's illegal for you to be presenting her card, and if the store realises their mistake they could probably pursue the matter with the police.