Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 9,055
- Location
- In my penthouse, Park Ave
I'd agree with BaZ ^
Fletcher + Anderson is clearly our best pairing, both players are capable of running for starters.
Even at the age Scholes is at, doesn't he still do everything Carrick can do but better? Looking from the outside, I'd say a CM pairing of Scholes + Anderson is Utd's strongest, with Fletcher coming in if you decided to play 3 in the middle.
When Scholes came on a couple of weeks ago for Carrick I think it was, it was just plain embarrasing how much quicker he was around the pitch than Carrick.
Carrick is just slow at everything these days.
Even at the age Scholes is at, doesn't he still do everything Carrick can do but better? Looking from the outside, I'd say a CM pairing of Scholes + Anderson is Utd's strongest, with Fletcher coming in if you decided to play 3 in the middle.
I didn't use the word tackling in my post![]()
Even at the age Scholes is at, doesn't he still do everything Carrick can do but better? Looking from the outside, I'd say a CM pairing of Scholes + Anderson is Utd's strongest, with Fletcher coming in if you decided to play 3 in the middle.
Would Carrick make a better CB than a DM?
I just mention this since if I recall the only thing he did right in the game against Bolton was make a few last-ditch blocks in the box, everything else was the usual back-passing, inaccurate hoofs forward, and losing the ball. He mentioned recently that Phelan said he might be pressed into doing it since we have so many central defenders out, and remarked: "I don't fancy that", but if the shoe fits...
Would Carrick make a better CB than a DM?