• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CES Live Streams

For the love of god, the "it's a super computer" thing is grating, because he left out the part of a quote which equated it to a supercomputer from 1998. Yeah, K1 still has what, less than 1/10th the power of a 780ti/290x system, neither of which get called supercomputers. Everything around today is a supercomputer compared to something from 1998.


The unreal engine looks interesting, though more complex shipping games will be interesting to see. Unreal tech demo's always look great and what we get in real life are a touch different. :(

People do seem to be confusing K1 as something new because of the Unreal engine, it's just a case of them finally making a modern engine, which really is happening because the consoles were finally updated. K1 is fast for a mobile but Tegra k1 does not equal a 780gtx, it's the SAME architecture, the mobile 780gtx is many many many times faster than Tegra K1.

It looks like it's going to be more like a a year + till we really see "next gen" games on PC. Everyone is seemingly working on their next gen engines which really push the boat massively compared to the likes of Unreal engine 3. There is going to be some amazing stuff once game dev's have their engines ready and get some practice on the new engines.

Frostbite 3 seems a bit odd, it's a very in between engine. They obviously felt the need to upgrade, but they've made it too current gen. I think they'll be jumping to Frostbite 4 as a ground up new one(with no lead thread) asap.


I'm actually not sure about Denver, if the die approximations were to be believed the 2 denver cores seemed to take up a decent amount less space than the 4 a15's. but it could be a case of, again because so many engines have a lead thread, maybe they've sacrificed some all out performance for the ability to have one uber thread. It's very rare for less die space to be faster when comparing architectures on the same process. 64bit increases die space required with more registers, etc. It could be their die pictures were not at all accurate. Will be interesting to see how they compete on power and performance. Either way, 192 cores isn't as big as a lot of people seem to think, mobile arm chips, Tegra, A7, these aren't tiny 20mm2 chips any more. They are comparable in die size to reasonably sized gpu's these days.
 
Last edited:
When he says mobile he's not talking about a mobile gpu such as a laptop but a Phone/tablet type gpu for which it is a huge leap in tech
 
No maxwell, no new/rebranded gpus or a 790
Lets hope AMd have some interesting new stuff :)

True. But still having that much GPU power in a phone or phablet etc and running games of the fidelity shown is exciting.
 
He keeps going out of his way to not say that, specifically saying first to make a dual core, first to make a quad core, he's also making the argument currently that having kepler in mobile will help having the same architecture on mobile and desktop like it's a major advantage... with a PS4 and X1 in the picture they showed, along with a desktop and mobile, which is not at all disingenuous while banging on about Kepler being available on all different types of hardware.

He's also missing out the part where he's asking dev's to spend more to make a AAA title scale down to mobile better, which is insanely bad for desktop/console gamers. Asking them to make a single game that could work on all platforms will heavily, badly limit the high end.

Once again he's just said along the lines of PC, console, Tegra K1, same architecture, same hardware, same engine, wow. Talking up Kepler with pictures of AMD based console hardware and claiming the same architecture on all platforms is soooo wrong.

The current system of targeting higher end PC hardware has not been working well at all. All most devs have done is use one or two threads very in-efficiently IMO (with some standout exceptions) when there is plenty more on the table.

I would sooner they build a game engine which scales from single core/single gpu mobile right up to quad-sli rigs with 8 cores as it will build in a certain level of efficiency and multi-core awareness i.e - 'oh look you have an additional core, I can use that', you have additional ram, I will cache levels in there etc.
 
Jen-Hsun Huang been hitting the gym hard man. Lifting competition vs AMD's CEO please.

On a serious note demo's look very impressive but we need to start seeing all this stuff together in one game.
 
Sorry, I only go for nvidia guys :o

What's not to like? :p

JLuREZI.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom