Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Nov 2019
- Posts
- 4,305
He "converted" to Christianity apparently so I think your suggestion is unlikely.
Chemical attack in London...
- Thread starter Uther
- Start date
Soldato
If they are 'organised', then surely they'd just take him to a deserted location and kill him. Why would they risk their business by protecting a nobody with half his face all over the national media?.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 3,817
I reckon he's being served up in kebabs.
You read it here first, folks.
You read it here first, folks.
Reading killer allowed to stay in Britain despite history of violence
Home Office granted Khairi Saadallah leave to remain in the country due to ‘errors’ in how his case was handled
www.thetimes.co.uk
The government needs to be held to account for allowing these people to stay in the country.
That's what elections are for. They hold the government to account. Unfortunately every government is the same regardless of political colour. So holding them it account is pretty pointless.Reading killer allowed to stay in Britain despite history of violence
Home Office granted Khairi Saadallah leave to remain in the country due to ‘errors’ in how his case was handled
The government needs to be held to account for allowing these people to stay in the country.
I don't have much confidence in Labour doing much re: asylum seekers either. They might be good for infrastructure investment and overhauling planning, building more new homes etc.. but I'm not sure they're going to tackle the illegals or the issue with asylum seekers.
As D.P. was in complete denial of earlier it's not just illegals and failed asylum applicants (most of whom we don't end up deporting anyway) but we grant asylum at like twice the rate of some EU countries... yet we're all signed up to the same international convention on refugees and the same ECHR.
I think part of this is the civil servants within the home office, any government wanting to change this is going to have to force through a lot more legislation. We're both accepting too many and we've got such an inefficient system to remove them. The £1 million spent on deporting just one gang rapist was ridiculous.
The other issue is WTF are we doing housing them in inner London boroughs- it's tragic what happened to this woman but there was no need for her to be given free accommodation in Clapham in the first place.
There's a ridiculous amount of social housing now being allocated to people who weren't born here, that's a really bad indicator - social housing in central London is a huge state freebie for those fortunate enough to get it, most people are not net contributors to begin with let alone if you take into account the huge benefit they're getting with either free or subsidised accommodation. Even as legal immigrants, it's likely a big net drain for many in addition to occupying a resource that could be used by others.
It's. a bit of a lottery in some respects re: how it's allocated, with council housing the tenants can pass the lease on to heirs and rent paid (even though usually way below market rates) counts towards a discount if they ever wish to exercise the right to buy it. It's good to have *some* social housing but the proposals to build 50% social housing instead of the legal minimums are also stifling development, end result in you get less development and the development you do get is half allocated via some opaque system to lots of unproductive people, plenty of whom are foreigners/immigrants and meanwhile the more productive people are paying higher rents or mortgage costs.
As D.P. was in complete denial of earlier it's not just illegals and failed asylum applicants (most of whom we don't end up deporting anyway) but we grant asylum at like twice the rate of some EU countries... yet we're all signed up to the same international convention on refugees and the same ECHR.
I think part of this is the civil servants within the home office, any government wanting to change this is going to have to force through a lot more legislation. We're both accepting too many and we've got such an inefficient system to remove them. The £1 million spent on deporting just one gang rapist was ridiculous.
The other issue is WTF are we doing housing them in inner London boroughs- it's tragic what happened to this woman but there was no need for her to be given free accommodation in Clapham in the first place.
There's a ridiculous amount of social housing now being allocated to people who weren't born here, that's a really bad indicator - social housing in central London is a huge state freebie for those fortunate enough to get it, most people are not net contributors to begin with let alone if you take into account the huge benefit they're getting with either free or subsidised accommodation. Even as legal immigrants, it's likely a big net drain for many in addition to occupying a resource that could be used by others.
It's. a bit of a lottery in some respects re: how it's allocated, with council housing the tenants can pass the lease on to heirs and rent paid (even though usually way below market rates) counts towards a discount if they ever wish to exercise the right to buy it. It's good to have *some* social housing but the proposals to build 50% social housing instead of the legal minimums are also stifling development, end result in you get less development and the development you do get is half allocated via some opaque system to lots of unproductive people, plenty of whom are foreigners/immigrants and meanwhile the more productive people are paying higher rents or mortgage costs.
Last edited:
Your graph largely supports my point, UK acceptance rate was below or at the EU average for every year 2013-2021 on that chary, then something happened in 2022.
ike the 2022 invasion of Ukraine , the pull lut of tripps from Afghanistan at the end lf 2021 and ongoing impacts of Hong Kong protests.
But i am happy to be presented with evidence of any other reason why the acceptance rate should suddenly change in 2022. Naively you might think it was to clear the backlog but in fact Asylum process had slowed down dramatically
ike the 2022 invasion of Ukraine , the pull lut of tripps from Afghanistan at the end lf 2021 and ongoing impacts of Hong Kong protests.
But i am happy to be presented with evidence of any other reason why the acceptance rate should suddenly change in 2022. Naively you might think it was to clear the backlog but in fact Asylum process had slowed down dramatically
Associate
finsbury park mosque was covering up and training terrorists for years?
It doesn't at all, it backs up what I claimed and what you denied. You're happy to be presented with evidence as you've already have been shown the figures from 2021 and 2023 and yet you carry on in denial still, Ukrainians (women, children and elderly) are here under a temporary visa scheme (most of them will return too after the war has ended), they're not even part of the asylum figures but you just make stuff up as usual.
I showed you this already, this was a reply to the post where you came out with the same cope... after having already been shown this previously. So this is now the third time you've been shown the data yet you still waffle about Ukraine and Hong Kong:
FML you can't help lying, I even posted the link for you earlier in direct reply to your post:
I guess you got Afghanistan right at least:
Last edited:
Soldato
Have they still not caught this guy? MET is a laughing stock it really is. Its not been fit for purpose for a long time and this just proves it.
Associate
i thought every street was covered by CCTV in London...... or was that a myth?
Associate
It is, its just not very good.
Soldato
delete
Last edited:
Associate
Ezedi and injured woman were in a relationship - police
We've just had an update from the Metropolitan Police - it was an off-camera, on the record briefing, which we'll bring you in the next few posts.Cmdr Jon Savell says the police now have a "very strong indication" that Abdul Shokoor Ezedi was in a relationship with the woman he's thought to have injured in the attack last week.
He says that police believe the relationship had "broken down".
"We can’t give any details about how long the relationship had taken place or how it broke down," he adds.
Richard London, from London has spoken about London. Sounds like an authority.
Aside from any issues about image quality, people have already been mentioned that the more CCTV cameras there are, the more footage there is to get hold of and review, all of which takes time.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 4,350
Up and vanished like a fart in the wind.
Soldato
Have they still not found this **** yet?Amazing to think that someone could be hiding him after what he did.
What we need is more facial recognition cameras.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,650
Isn't the problem that he's missing part of his face ?What we need is more facial recognition cameras.
