Do you get a better ISP router with these City Fibre providers? The Virgin Superhub 3 gets a lot of criticism as a router but I still use mine. If I was to swap to City Fibre and get a new router from the ISP, it might save me having to buy my own?
I went live with no one on city fibre on the 5th, I hadnt heard good things about their router and it had minimal ethernet ports so I bought my own. If you supply your own router they credit your account back with £50.Do you get a better ISP router with these City Fibre providers? The Virgin Superhub 3 gets a lot of criticism as a router but I still use mine. If I was to swap to City Fibre and get a new router from the ISP, it might save me having to buy my own?
Check https://bidb.uk/ to see where they're doing roadworks and https://labs.thinkbroadband.com/local/broadband-map#6/gigafast/ to see where they're live, should give you a better indication.Shows 'coming soon' on the various ISP sites, and on City Fibre's site, but it's been like that for ages.
For your info Octaplus are currently supplying the TPLink/Aginet EX230v, as i have just had a replacement for my TPLink C6 V3.2 sent today.My options are a lot poorer than they were just a couple of weeks ago - a few providers had prices at £30 a month now these all seem to have increased.
At these prices I won't be switching away from Virgin. I already get 250 Mbps from them for £27 a month inc TV and so I could probably negotiate a speed increase for the same money if I stick.
You're comparing 250 Mbps to 900 Mbps (which also happens to be symmetrical and VM is not), that's really not a fair comparison. You also don't have to choose a 900 Mbps on the CityFibre network. Not to mention other benefits such as static IP, lower latency, potentially better customer service, not having to ring up at each contract end to renegotiate etc.At these prices I won't be switching away from Virgin. I already get 250 Mbps from them for £27 a month inc TV and so I could probably negotiate a speed increase for the same money if I stick.
There would be no point getting anything other than 900 on city fibre though, its barely any cheaper to go for a lesser speed.You're comparing 250 Mbps to 900 Mbps (which also happens to be symmetrical and VM is not), that's really not a fair comparison. You also don't have to choose a 900 Mbps on the CityFibre network. Not to mention other benefits such as static IP, lower latency, potentially better customer service, not having to ring up at each contract end to renegotiate etc.
If you're going to compare Apples, at least compare them to Apples.
I'm not sure why you're making so many posts and new threads about routers and CF and what not, just switch, or don't switch. If you're going to compare every ISP to the nth degree by the time you've actually made a decision the goalposts will have moved.
Im open to ideas within reasonable price thresholds - the ones you implied seem about right to me.So, are you looking for the absolute cheapest you can get, or are you open to other ideas?
You can't have that though, nobody can afford to run a physical cable to your house and operate an internet service over it for £15 each month.
Because costs are not just from physical cabling, billing, customer service etc. There's way more to it than that, and ultimately more bandwidth through their network and peering that into other networks costs them more money.Well exactly, the speed of the service is a nonsense really, the costs come from the physical cabling, the customer service the billing etc. so why do they even bother offering slower packages to save a quid or two a month.
starting to get worried now 2 months to go ... and there not even testing round here yet ... why don't they just hook it up street by street ?CityFibre/GigaNet started installing Fibre down my road September 2022.
It’s now January 2024 and they still can’t give me a firm date as to when it will be live!
Out of contract with Sky so paying a fortune for 70mbps.