COD4 vs COD MW2

Its simply a reskinned cod4, but it sells. Why should they actually push boundaries if they can sell 4 million copies as it is. Saving the devs time and money. Im not a massive fan of COD in general and I have not bought the new one out of principle. But I must say I prefer the fact there are no tanks, its man vs man the way its nearly allways been in COD. Your playing the wrong game if thats what your looking for. BFBC2 and BF3 are what you should be looking at, both I think are looking much better games then MW2 anyways. I see your point but it really should have been expected what your saying.
 
I thought you had a reasonable point until you compared it to Left 4 Dead 2. :rolleyes:

They both offer near enough exactly the same improvements upon their respective original...
 
Sorry thats what i wanted to add.... sure by now with DICe tearing it up with building destruction... you'd have thought 2 years at work they might have attemped something with regrds to build destruction???

Anyway its clear than most think i'm wrong, so its fine. We are all entitled to our opinions.... i'm gona continue enjoying this till BF:BC2 comes out.... so then you COd players can carry on looking round corners while the BF lot will be blowing holes thro them haha!
 
Last edited:
Sorry? Improved on the pc? In what way?

Who said anything about PC, I said MP gameplay in general.

The challenges have all been expanded, there are more and different perks, more weapons, more unlocks, more levels, more ways go get XP, more killstreaks, more customisation of classes etc etc.

Yes boo hoo PC doesn't get dedicated servers I think that's been covered to death, but on the whole the MP game mode has been massively updated with extra content.
 
Yes boo hoo PC doesn't get dedicated servers I think that's been covered to death, but on the whole the MP game mode has been massively updated with extra content.

This. IW have done a lot of work, and a large majority of the exposure got lost during the "boycott". Yes they've removed what some people feel are core elements of the gameplay experience, but they have tried to update a lot of the features found in CoD4. How you can say MW1 and 2 are the same games is beyond me. Its like saying Crysis and Crysis: Warhead are the same game, yes they have similarities but overall the gameplay experience is different.
 
Last edited:
This. IW have done a lot of work, and a large majority of the exposure got lost during the "boycott". Yes they've removed what some people feel are core elements of the gameplay experience, but they have tried to update a lot of the features found in CoD4.

What I expected from MW2:

1) Vehicle use online
2) Destructible environments....

What did we get more of the same! COME ON PEOPLE CANT YOU SEE THAT!

Take a step back and look at it...

Innovation is the key word imo to a games natural evolution….. MW2 got more of the same….

Innovation is the 2 points I’ve made above, things which completely change the game play!!! Please explain how what i have said is wrong, i really want to know, cos nothing yet has made me think otherwise.

Any1 else agree?

IW FAIL!
 
Lol @ me, proper rage on.... just get really annoyed how people cant see passed their ignorance sometimes at how bland of an update MW2 is from COD4.. especially as IW absolutely **** on PC gamers!

*GOON bangs his head agaist the wall "why why why why" haha
 
What I expected from MW2:

1) Vehicle use online
2) Destructible environments....

What did we get more of the same! COME ON PEOPLE CANT YOU SEE THAT!

From Half Life 3 I expect virtual reality integration. I'm going to kill Valve if its not implemented :rolleyes:.

You're just throwing the toys out of the pram because your expectations weren't matched. They gave you no reason to believe that the above two would be in the game and quite frankly, you sound like a Battlefield fanboy just waiting for a bangwagon to roll along that you can jump on.


Take a step back and look at it...

Innovation is the key word imo to a games natural evolution….. MW2 got more of the same….

Innovation is the 2 points I’ve made above, things which completely change the game play!!! Please explain how what i have said is wrong, i really want to know, cos nothing yet has made me think otherwise.

Innovation is not key to a games natural evolution, a new ip is the key to innovation. How many sequels are more of the same? Oh, a large majority. And what generally happens to the sequels that mix things up? Oh, they flop do they?

We've been explaining all the way through why you're wrong but you refuse to listen.


Any1 else agree?

IW FAIL!

Arguement fail.
 
From Half Life 3 I expect virtual reality integration. I'm going to kill Valve if its not implemented :rolleyes:.
you sound like a Battlefield fanboy just waiting for a bangwagon to roll along that you can jump on.
QUOTE]

Well done you actually read the other posts then!

Fine, i'm wrong your right....

MW2 is the best ever Sequel in the history of gaming.... its got so many new things in it that i will be playing it non stop for the next 2 years, was the best £35 i've even spent, they certainly are years ahead of any other game play!
 
Last edited:
Well done you actually read the other posts then!

Fine, i'm wrong your right....

MW2 is the best ever Sequel in the history of gaming.... its got so many new things in it that i will be playing it non stop for the next 2 years, was the best £35 i've even spent, they certainly are years ahead of any other game play!

Good to see you've finally admitted the truth :p
 
Good to see you've finally admitted the truth :p

Indeed, i mean at the end of the day, i'l just follow the great and holy IW... after all they can NEVER get anything wrong!

just last thoughts tho... which one shall i chose..

hmmmm.... massive battlefield's with true war experience while keeping to the FPS genre, with heli's, tanks and TOW's and where you can blow everything on the map up.....

Or

A basic FPS remake of an older FPS game play with a few rubbish new perks.
 
Back
Top Bottom