COD4 vs COD MW2
- Thread starter [TFU] Thegoon84
- Start date
![[TFU] Thegoon84](/styles/overclockers/avatars/6.png){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,089
- Location
- Swansea
Haha you really want to go there?
Ok just a few....
* destruction 2.0 (not just an update, totally changing warfare.... you can now chip away little holes to shoot thro, you can also take down entire buildings... if enemy are in there, then you get a kill for each one.... amazing and complete innovative!)
* New game modes (2 of which DICE are saving for us to guess)
* New Rank system
* PC designed controls (actually appreciate the difference between console and PC)
* Completly new TYPE vehicle's
Are to name but a few, i'm in work atm, so i'm put the rest on when i get back.
Last edited:
You're advising me to read your posts whilst missing the point of mine completely. Look through my post history, you'll see how much of a farce I think MW2 is. I just don't think its as bad as you're making it out to be, especially not whilst you're cupping the balls of Dice at the same time.
So they've updated the features found in Bad Company 1?
I'm really looking forward to it but you have to remember the first one was gash.
Also the only thing remotely innovative above is the new destruction engine which again was gash in BF:BC.
Why did you expect those? They weren't in the previous one and they never even hinted they would be adding them?
* destruction 2.0 - did you honestly just answer that something with '2.0' in its name is somehow innovative?
* New game modes (2 of which DICE are saving for us to guess) - Spec Ops is a new game mode and i'm sure the MP in general has a few extra modes
* New Rank system - same as MW2?
* PC designed controls (actually appreciate the difference between console and PC) - you basically mean it has a lean key?
* Complete new vehicle's - Basically the same as the old vehicles with new skins though
You can twist things to make a point any which way you want
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,408
- Location
- Surrey
lol, you're bashing MW2 for being simply updates of the first yet gushing about L4D2 and MC2 which are exactly the same 
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,089
- Location
- Swansea
If you read what i said also you'd see that i'm not a complete hater, i play the game on ps3 cos i refused to buy it on PC, but i have played it on PC. Think its fun....
But asked the question " Whats the difference between COD4 and MW2" How this is supposed to be MW2 is beond me, it seems more like Treyarch did a better job on COD5 and they had a lot less money and time.... iw could even put a tank in FFS!
But asked the question " Whats the difference between COD4 and MW2" How this is supposed to be MW2 is beond me, it seems more like Treyarch did a better job on COD5 and they had a lot less money and time.... iw could even put a tank in FFS!
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,408
- Location
- Surrey
Because it isn't that sort of game? The focus is on squad vs squad combat, tanks have no part in that.
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,089
- Location
- Swansea
Can i just say... no its not me in that video where that guy loses his head over COD MW2 haha! at least i think its not 
I'm just leaving this now, b4 i get banned. Dont know what else to say.
I'm just leaving this now, b4 i get banned. Dont know what else to say.
Can i just say... no its not me in that video where that guy loses his head over COD MW2 haha! at least i think its not
I'm just leaving this now, b4 i get banned. Dont know what else to say.
Well you could try rational replies to points raised against you rather than continually moaning it doesn't have tanks in it.
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,089
- Location
- Swansea
continually moaning it doesn't have tanks in it.
What? have you read anything i've said.... i dont remember putting in tanks tanks tank in every reason why....
How can i give a rational response to something i personally dont agree with?
Would you like me to lie and say "Yes i agree with what your saying but...."? Just being honest and a little one side if i am honest which is wrong granted. i can see that and ofc i can see others points of view, i was just putting out some home truths about the game.
Do you know what rational means?
If you had to reply rationally and that led you to actually agreeing with everyone else, then obviously your position would be stupid.
If you actually have a point you should be able to respond to people in a rational manner without needing to lie.
It's all good I know what you mean and completely agree MW2 brings nothing particularly new to the table, I can see myself returning to MW1 very soon. I didn't actually expect anything more though.
The new BF will probably be great but it too isn't offering anything new and it has to be better than BF:BC because that was awful.
The new BF will probably be great but it too isn't offering anything new and it has to be better than BF:BC because that was awful.
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,089
- Location
- Swansea
Sorry but imo my responses have been exactly the same as the first response i received.
For me sarcasm will be met with sarcasm.
Can we just drop this now please? Not because i'm avoiding the replies, i feel my responses have been adequate... Just turning a little personal now and its never nice.
For me sarcasm will be met with sarcasm.
Can we just drop this now please? Not because i'm avoiding the replies, i feel my responses have been adequate... Just turning a little personal now and its never nice.
Last edited:
IMO mw2 is already getting tedious online, the server and lag situation is annoying, as is the fact we cant even choose what map we want to play on. Add to that players are starting the sad prone spam routine and i can see how this game will "evolve" over the next few months, servers loaded with everyone doing it because like always its become "the way to play".
Prone has been nothng but a pain in the ass in quite a few of the gmaes its been introduced to, cod series has been plagued with spammers and for some reason the tards at iw seemingly don't even consider removing it, it was bad in the bf series as well but theyve seen sense and its not in bc2 at all.
Ill be glad when bc2 beta rolls along, mw2 is becoming quite the yawnfest for me.
Prone has been nothng but a pain in the ass in quite a few of the gmaes its been introduced to, cod series has been plagued with spammers and for some reason the tards at iw seemingly don't even consider removing it, it was bad in the bf series as well but theyve seen sense and its not in bc2 at all.
Ill be glad when bc2 beta rolls along, mw2 is becoming quite the yawnfest for me.
Last edited:
The Vehicle use in COD3 and COD 5 was down to Treyarch making the games not Ifinity Ward.
IMO that is also a step backward from the COD series as 3 & 4 were poor games.
Don't know why you expected vehicle use in COD6, With regards to what new. They have changed the gameplay by making it more newbie friendly, It take a riduculous amount of ammo to kill people now.
IMO that is also a step backward from the COD series as 3 & 4 were poor games.
Don't know why you expected vehicle use in COD6, With regards to what new. They have changed the gameplay by making it more newbie friendly, It take a riduculous amount of ammo to kill people now.
A what ?
