Considering the lists were made by different people and has no guarantee of their completeness I'd say comparing them is utterly pointless, and who's to know whether the inventions would have been made without the Union? And what of Scottish people inventing things in England and vice-versa, for which side does it count?
I would hope most of it is tongue in cheek, but this sort of thing can be taken the wrong way, and people will undoubtably take things too far, which is where the entrenching of division comes in.
I would rather we were all proud of our collective achievements, because I believe we wouldn't have made anywhere near as many if we'd have stayed seperate.
I think there are pretty comprehensive lists and records of history, as for the Union then that's a historian's fallacy in that context for all intents and purposes and the effect is debatable and a lot of the time irrelevent. The English/Scottish/Irish/Welsh thing is a valid point, but it would depend on how serious you take this I suppose.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
Britain has always been divided however? Science didn't follow political boundries pre 'Union', it wouldn't after. Our collectiveness came from our proximity, not a political Union that for a very long time had no effect what so ever on this subject if any at all.
Last edited: