Conspiracy theories...

Besides, I've already changed the topic onto another CT. Why don't you read what i posted and come back to me with your "Official" reply?

Because it takes a lot of work to look into conspiracy theories and tbh that one doesn't concern me. You can't just read a few websites and come to a conclusion. Everything can be made to look possible.

I've already stated many times that I'm not here to change or prove my belief, I'm here to give an opinion, if i wanted to prove my opinion then i would, but i don't have to, there for i wont.
Normally people like to share there beliefs especially on a forum that is made for discussion.
 
But to change the topic slightly, there is a rather interesting development coming to light. Personally i don't believe it, but its interesting none the less.

One Evan can get his teeth into.

-------

Benazir Bhutto, the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, had consistently denied any role of the Pakistani government in Korea’s nuclear ambitions. But now, it has come to light that a CD containing vital nuclear data was carried by her personally to be handed over to her Korean counterpart as part of a secret deal!

*snip*

Everyone knows that Pakistan helped North Korea to go nuclear; that's old news. It was reported by the Beeb as early as 2002. But to claim that Bhutto was some sort of king pin is just plain stupid.

Firstly, what kind of idiot seriously believes that Pakistan would choose to smuggle top secret military technology by burning it onto a CD and asking Bhutto to stuff it into her pockets?

Secondly, why even resort to subterfuge in the first place? There would be no need for it, since Bhutto was Prime Minister, and could carry whatever she liked to whomever she liked.

Thirdly, since she was flying from her home country to a friendly nation, who was she supposed to be hiding the CD from?

Fourthly, why use a coat with deep pockets - as if this would make any difference? Why not just put the CD in a bag or a briefcase?

Fifthly, why would the PM be carrying the CD anyway? Why not a representative of the military, or a member of the nuclear weapons R&D team?

Sixthly, why would Bhutto make the CD herself? She wasn't a nuclear scientist, and she had no expertise in the field of nuclear weaponry. And what evidence is there that she even had access to that sort of data?

Finally, who the hell cares?
 
Last edited:
Sixthly, why would Bhutto make the CD herself? She wasn't a nuclear scientist, and she had no expertise in the field of nuclear weaponry. And what evidence is there that she even had access to that sort of data?

Finally, who the hell cares?

Thats what you found odd?

Not that while being essentially a nuclear arms dealer, she just kept writing letters to her old journalist friend detailing the specifics?

Call me paranoid but I'd tend to keep that to myself.


not only that but she apparently shoved several hundred tons of metal into her coat pockets
insisted she carry back the disassembled parts of an entire missile so that Pakistani scientists could study it part by part.

:p
 
Thats what you found odd?

Not that while being essentially a nuclear arms dealer, she just kept writing letters to her old journalist friend detailing the specifics?

Call me paranoid but I'd tend to keep that to myself.


not only that but she apparently shoved several hundred tons of metal into her coat pockets


:p

What can I say? I was trying to be courteous.

:)
 
Confusing me with Radiation.

I don't believe in any secret society or lizard men.

Heh, he gets topics and people mixed up a bit so you can't be sure he's taken what you've said alone without muddying it up with other stuff, btw secret societies don't require belief as they're quite real but i doubt they're that powerful.

Oh and they're not lizard men, people have researched their history and found that their bloodlines trace all the way back to a ceiling dwelling feline in egyptian times, take a closer look at that all seeing eye at the top of the pyramid, I think you'll now realise who it belongs to!
 
Not sure of the source but i've been trying to clear up this image a bit and look what i found! :eek:

theallseeingceilingcatzg6.jpg
 
:rolleyes:

I can't even be bothered with the moon one any more and certainly not for rubbish like that you can easily look up and find the answers for yourself.

There's far to much evidence we landed on the moon and not one single bit of
"evidence# conspiracy theorists put forward stand up to any scrutiny.
 
Back
Top Bottom