Are you replying to [email protected] by any chance? I've done that many, many times
Are you replying to [email protected] by any chance? I've done that many, many times
No no.. I managed to pull the proper email out of that message and pasted it in the to: field but I am getting this bounce - The format of the recipient's e-mail address isn't valid
The domain is .ac.uk which I assume is a school address?? Not sure why my outlook doesn't like that :/
Until I find a solution please email me at the address I posted above.
TY
another thing I just noticed about AndyOCUK's results was that the H50 fan was going 1592 RPM and the ECO fan was going 1339 RPM - thats going to explain a few degree's as well.
Cheers,
Barry
Hi mate.
Both the H50 and the Eco state in the manuals to plug the Fan onto the CPU Fan header and the pump on to any spare chassis fan header. As seen in the photo's, this was done.
might be a bad fan I suppose. I'll test again as soon as I get chance. Baby has taken most of my time this evening......gone are the days of spending hour after hour tweaking and fiddling with PC hardware lol
My build log:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18108493&highlight=username_Yozz76
Problems with temps have stopped me from overclocking anything! However, after reading this thread I'm beginning to wonder if reseating the eco might do the trick? I've basically been too lazy since putting my system together to address the issue!
@ Barry, has the ECO been tested with AMD motherboards as it simply doesnt fit the ECS A785GM-AD3 (assuming its supposed to use the standard bracket rather than a custom one as there wasn't one in the box).
As stated in my testing methodology, both coolers were plugged into the same fan headers on the board and the BIOS settings set to default 'standard' mode. any speeding up or down of the fans has been done by the product itself.
This issue with mounting: As I stated earlier, this piece of plastic highlighted spun around freely and wouldn't stay put. The screw tightened up correctly and I verified even contact by rotating the whole unit 180 degrees and checking temps again. The slight differences between temperatures on the cores were all normal so I am satisfied that even contact with the CPU IHS was correct. If this was not the case, there would be an enormous difference in temperature with one or more cores. Also, the difference of 9 degreea at full load could easily be due to the fan pulling air throught the RAD rather than pushing and the quality of the fan as in CFM and blade area/ angle. To be fair, if the contact between the cooler and IHS were so far out, I think it would be MUCH more obvious than a 9 degree difference. A 130W TDP Chip at full load at 80 degrees would give far more dramatic results than running 9 degrees too warm. It would simply shut down mate More to the point, why has this part in question come loose?
Also as stated, I set these up as per manufacturer's instructions on a rig set up identically for both tests so the only differences here will be between the coolers on test.
I'll re-test the eco this evening if I get chance
Hope this helps
There wasn't one included in the box... No problems attaching it to the intel mobo tho, and I managed to attach my old domino to the am3 system with no problems!
@ Barry, has the ECO been tested with AMD motherboards as it simply doesnt fit the ECS A785GM-AD3 (assuming its supposed to use the standard bracket rather than a custom one as there wasn't one in the box).