Could humans ever live harmoniously

Soldato
Joined
25 Mar 2004
Posts
15,779
Location
Fareham
I don't think so, not any time soon anyway. Right now humans can't even agree on what date format to use, or what side of the road to drive on. We're a long way from being "Nation Earth" imo.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Dec 2006
Posts
15,370
World Peace is something I think about regularly.

Humanity "could" have lived in peace but it's not possible now because humanity has become enslaved and commercialised through generational societal brainwashing, and those with the power aren't showing signs of relinquishing ownership any time soon therefore fighting and dissonance will keep rising until the kettle boils over here and there.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Posts
2,377
Location
Surrey
Also, consider that more overcrowding will lead to increased violence. Unless we can do something to address the unsustainable global population increases then I'm afraid we're just going experience more violence. Humans were meant to live in family units with limited interaction with other family units.
Yes I agree with this, especially after reading "Guns, Germs and Steel" and "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind". We evolved to live in small groups where everyone looked after each other and worked together because it benefited the group directly, whereas now we are separated from our families for most of the day and forced to work with strangers performing mundane tasks.

It seems that people still living in "primitive" cultures are a lot happier than "civilised" people and work less.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Nov 2004
Posts
2,829
The agricultural revolution was the point of no return for living in harmony. Now humans are increasingly dependent on distant third parties for food, accommodation, security, raising offspring etc. Autonomy has been lost. The commoditization of time has cost the human race.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
It seems that people still living in "primitive" cultures are a lot happier than "civilised" people and work less.

really? they seem to be barely surviving, and dieing of easily curable conditions whenever they're on the tv.


where as we can do pretty much anything we like within reason, i mean can travel, can eat anything from anywhere, drink a different drink every day for a year.

if your job is mundane minimise its time and enjoy the rest of your life.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
The agricultural revolution was the point of no return for living in harmony. Now humans are increasingly dependent on distant third parties for food, accommodation, security, raising offspring etc. Autonomy has been lost. The commoditization of time has cost the human race.


do you really want to be spending your life, subsistence farming a ****** plot of land till you die?

it didnt cost humanity it liberated humanity.
 
Associate
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Posts
2,377
Location
Surrey
really? they seem to be barely surviving, and dieing of easily curable conditions whenever they're on the tv.
A lot of diseases are the result of close contact with livestock and living in constant close proximity to so many other humans. Don't know which ones are barely surviving, but I've seen plenty of tribes in the pacific isles and rain forests who look pretty happy. And any of those people could join the modern world if they wished, so there must be a reason they choose not to.

do you really want to be spending your life, subsistence farming a ****** plot of land till you die? it didnt cost humanity it liberated humanity.
The point is you would not be subsistence farming. There was a reason humans lived as hunter gatherers for 100k+ years. Farming is a lot more work and you are at the whim of the weather/seasons and highly likely to end up starving due to a bad harvest. Hunter gatherers could just move on to another area once food ran out at a particular location.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
A lot of diseases are the result of close contact with livestock and living in constant close proximity to so many other humans. Don't know which ones are barely surviving, but I've seen plenty of tribes in the pacific isles and rain forests who look pretty happy. And any of those people could join the modern world if they wished, so there must be a reason they choose not to.

the fact they have zero skill and nothing of value outside their small communities meaning leaving is instant poverty?

The point is you would not be subsistence farming. There was a reason humans lived as hunter gatherers for 100k+ years. Farming is a lot more work and you are at the whim of the weather/seasons and highly likely to end up starving due to a bad harvest. Hunter gatherers could just move on to another area once food ran out at a particular location.

well that sounds delightful...

subsistence hunting and gathering then, personally i prefer motorcycles and being able to see clearly than trying to skin a goat.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2012
Posts
8,333
the fact they have zero skill and nothing of value outside their small communities meaning leaving is instant poverty?

i think he means collectively as a community there's nothing stoping them taking on modern technology and ways of life (albeit yes it'd take a while) however they choose not to.

there is something wrong with our culture, just look at youth suicide rates in the uk, people born into a world which is better than it's ever been but something's driving them to desperation.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Aug 2007
Posts
28,597
Location
Auckland
I can't sleep, too much work on so i digressed and started pondering the above...

So, what do you reckon?

Could humans ever reach a level of intelligence, emotional or otherwise which meant working together for the greater good prevailed? A world where science trumped religion. Where narrow minded us and them attitutes, nationalism and so forth were no more?

I for one dont hold up much hope :p I dont understand the psychology behind it(feel free to enlighten) but i believe humans, the masses specifically are inherently drawn towards silos no matter how big or small that they can feel a sense of belonging to. Wether that be religion, a country, a football club... perhaps its a pack thing.

Random and slightly ridiculous chain of thought, i know!

No, because:

  1. Anime
  2. Donald 'Two Scoops' Trump (can we have a hey LOL for this one!)
  3. Most people care more about themselves, to the exclusion of others.
I don't think we have it in us and I include myself in that bleak analysis.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Oct 2009
Posts
3,214
Location
United Kingdom
No. This is demonstrated at a very basic level. Take football for example. Local teams are essentially like "Clans" or "Tribes" which people will defend its honour through protest, show of force and violence in many instances.

The same can be applied to Family, Nations, Continents, Races and Religions. It's not something that can be easily changed, I think something like this is within all humans at our core.
 
Back
Top Bottom