Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,561
- Location
- Falling...
Im 100% WFH these days for a firm in Edinburgh but live outside the M25 in Bucks. Ive popped into the office for a meeting once in two years. It works for me as it saves me a 435mile commute which is great for the environment and saves me a boat load of time.
If the government is genuine about the environment, not having 100s of people commuting unnecessarily, is a good place to start. Lead from the front.
Agreed. And you're adding skills and insights that that company wouldn't ordinarily have.
However you're later in your career and probably more autonomous and self starter. For a young professional or early career person, or an apprentice or graduate you cannot beat being mentored in an office environment or at least physical interaction. There are exceptions I'm sure but for swathes of people it will apply.
Productivity is a mixed bag I'm sure as many people browse Facebook at home as they do in the office. I.e. not working 100% of the time. And that's fine, your brain is unable to focus that long for so long anyway it's just normal. That's why surgeons, pilots (for example) have such a taxing job as they need pin sharp focus for extended periods of time.
For the rest of us, we can have short sharp moments of focus - and it's perfectly healthy to do that.
I think Well being is more of a factor, if people are happier then they will likely work a bit harder/longer. If people aren't tired by commuting or desperately waiting to clock off the chances are they're doing work. I think the same amount of work is being done in a day but just spread over a longer day, and that's absolutely fine. As long as the work gets done then I have no cause to complain.
Anyway, JRM is stuck in the past. I do wonder though what will happen to all the office buildings in big cities. 50% utilisation seems a bit of a waste unless you can repurpose the rest of the space or rent it out?