Although some will have you believe it's DEI and Woke nonsense causing all the destruction
Why haven't they conducted controlled burns?
Although some will have you believe it's DEI and Woke nonsense causing all the destruction
Why haven't they conducted controlled burns?
And the point is currently cruising at 60'000 feet over your head.So you can fly planes now? ILS and everything? impressive, most impressive.
Because big fire wouldn't allow it, it's all a conspiracy you knowWhy haven't they conducted controlled burns?
Because big fire wouldn't allow it, it's all a conspiracy you know
Why haven't they conducted controlled burns?
Because big fire wouldn't allow it, it's all a conspiracy you know
Maybe if you're curious though, go do some reading on the santa ana winds
Santa Ana winds - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Or you could watch this that explains things although be careful it has some woke climate change nonsense that might poison your mind
The wind is literally why the fires have got so big and problematic are you really this thick ? No amount of controlled burning is going to stop embers being blown in strong winds and the area is basically desert with brush dry as a bone because climate changeSo you've deflected to an article about wind
Many of the state’s largest and most destructive fires — including the Camp Fire in 2018, lightning complex fires in 2020, and Dixie Fire in 2021 — started in forests, and would therefore have likely been severely curtailed had the state done more controlled burns. According to ProPublica, anywhere between 4.4 million and 11.8 million acres used to burn annually in prehistoric California. By 2017, overzealous fire suppression efforts driven by regulatory barriers and short-term risk aversion had caused that number to drop to 13,000 acres. While the state has increased the amount of prescribed fire in recent years, the backlog of fuel is enormous.
But the L.A. fires didn’t start or spread in a forest. The largest blaze, in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood, ignited in a chaparral environment full of shrubs that have been growing for about 50 years. Jon Keeley, a research scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey and an adjunct professor at the University of California, said that’s not enough time for this particular environment to build up an “unnatural accumulation of fuels.”
“That's well within the historical fire frequency for that landscape,” Keeley told my colleague, Emily Pontecorvo, for her reporting on what started the fires. Generally, he said, these chaparral environments should burn every 30 to 130 years, with coastal areas like Pacific Palisades falling on the longer end of that spectrum. “Fuels are not really the issue in these big fires — it's the extreme winds. You can do prescription burning in chaparral and have essentially no impact on Santa Ana wind-driven fires.
I wonder how long the USA will deny climate change with trumpo coming in again - LA literally burns down and they wont change. Madness really.
Popcorn.jpg as we all watch end game capitalism ravage the planet & idiots still worshipping at the false alter of trickle down economics.
Still, been watching Silo on ATV+ to get some tips on how to survive in a post apocalyptic world.
The wind is literally why the fires have got so big and problematic are you really this thick ? No amount of controlled burning is going to stop embers being blown in strong winds and the area is basically desert with brush dry as a bone because climate change
They don't even believe having lots of guns have a correlation to school shooting so I don't think they will come around to Climate Change any time soon.
Sometimes I read these threads and think wtf even is thisPlay nicely kids
indeed thread gets spammed by musk silo bots/disciplesGet off twitter or at least spare us your unending political hogwash. It's pathetic.