I wasn't sure whether to reply, because you seem desperate to have an argument and see this discussion as a 'win' rather than a back and forth of opinions.
not at all, I simply clarified my position after you questioned it - it is a pretty important topic to me
WantoN said:I've had private messages from members to ignore you, so apparently you've a reputation for this style of 'look down your nose' discourse. That's not what I'm after, and blocking people because I find them rude isn't my style either.
well that's a nice ad-hominen to chuck in, I'm not being rude I just don't have the same opinion as you, I've laid out pretty clearly why that is too. I'm not going to change my view and suddenly become "open minded" to nonsense just because you think I should accept every possible suggestion regardless of how ridiculous some of them are.
WantoN said:I appreciate the book recommendation thank you, though the quick snippet from an individual unknown source is little use to anyone. And several of the supplements I'm on have insufficient research to support their efficacy, and they have changed my life.
that is again a bit dubious, I'd strongly recommend you read the book I suggested and you might well get a better idea of why. The whole "it worked for me" thing has plenty of issues, we do have clinical trials for a reason!
the quick snippet was from an article by a pharmacist who is part of a group of doctors and pharmacists writing articles on the website "science based medicine" - they're trying to correct some of the dubious stuff that gets promoted such as the very thing we're talking about - it is a bit dodgy for you to take exception to that and yet berate me for not being "open minded" towards the alternative medicine suggestion by an random poster
WantoN said:It's funny that you mention this, I've seen NHS dietitians, about 8 different top consultants as well as an abundance of their staff, and a military surgeon, and dietary advice is always the same; aside from triggers, skins and seeds diet makes no difference. And even with the conditions above, there can be no real change.
So where are you getting this idea that changing your diet can help for sure? I'm a little confused, as I find this stance contradictory.
That isn't necessarily true, I was just giving it as an example in an attempt to agree with you that dietary changes can help but if you're going to insist on arguing the point then - do you have strictures in your small intestine? That is the reason for a low residue diet sometimes being recommended, if you haven't then what you have said isn't surprising. Here is some NHS advice relating to it:
NHS said:A strict low fibre diet is not required but indigestible foods containing large amounts or ‘lumps’ of fibre which pass through the intestine unchanged, should be avoided.
http://www.nnuh.nhs.uk/publication/download/stricture-information-10-0-101/
This is perhaps a good illustration of why someone popping into a thread and saying "try XYZ" can be dodgy - people have different conditions.
WantoN said:Having slowly trialled many supplements and dietary additions proported for their anti inflammatory effects, at least anecdotally, and IGNORING what you've said regarding fibre, and the NHS stance of no seeds and skins, I am on the lowesr dose of steroids I've ever achieved and am feeling significantly better. It's been up and down, but rather than 40mg a day, I'm on 5 mg 1 in every 3 days, and this dose is still dropping. Am I wrong because you can find an unreferenced quote to dispute it?
Maybe... point is you don't really know for sure - you might well have gotten anyway better if you hadn't taken XYZ supplement, especially as you're apparently taking a bunch of different supplements (supposing one or two genuinely had an effect, you don't necessarily know which) - it isn't like there are another bunch of people who have been blinded and are taking a placebo that can be compared against. I mean you probably can infer that some food causes a bit of a reaction (like eating a big green salad and a bowl of all bran when you've got multiple strictures in the small intestine) and I'm not objecting here to someone say adding lots of turmeric because there is some evidence for anti inflammatory effect. I don't really want to conflate dietary stuff with someone recommending something as a medication, that was what I took issue with. (though perhaps it is wroth noting that some dietary supplements like garlic capsules can have an effect on medication too so perhaps worth checking with your doctor if you are experimenting with this stuff)
WantoN said:What I'm not saying is supplements and alternative remedies are a super cure. I'm saying don't be so quick to dismiss something you've no personal experience with. And it doesn't hurt to be polite either. A forum is about sharing and discussing ideas, not belittling people you don't agree with.
I disagreed with the suggestion and still disagree with the suggestion because such a recommendation is potentially dangerous. As for personal experience, I don't need personal experience with say homeopathy or magic healing crystals in order to dismiss them (though at least with those there is little chance of interactions). That isn't being rude or belittling people, perhaps you're being oversensitive about it. IMO recommending a "medicine" to a random person or people is a silly and irresponsible thing to do.. especially when you're claiming it is a medicine not just some dietary supplement. It potentially breaks the rules of the forum anyway (no medical advice) - I thought I made my reasons pretty clear before but essentially:
Firstly there is no evidence it actually works, secondly if it does work and has a significant effect it could easily have side effects and interactions - some of those interactions could be with the medication the person is already taking - that is dangerous. The person recommending the "alternative" isn't the guys doctor, doesn't have the background of his condition etc..
Here is another article on the product the poster recommended: https://sciencebasedpharmacy.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/oil-of-oregano/
sciencebasedpharmacy said:Despite its popularity, there is no science to support the use of oil of oregano for any medical condition. It’s not even pseudoscience. Suggesting that this herb is can effectively treat serious medical conditions like diabetes, asthma, and cancer is dangerous quackery. Unless your local drug store also sells groceries, oregano has no place in the science-based pharmacy. Save your oregano for your cooking, and use proven medicines for your illnesses.
Last edited: