Crysis Demo

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 14:41

frankmcg said:
Here ya go! As bigdave says though, this is a false proof as you're dividing both sides of the equation by 0 (since a-b=0). Now can we talk about the game?!

a = 1
b = 1

a = b
a2 = b2
a2 - b2 = 0
(a-b)(a+b) = 0
(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0
(a+b) = 0
1 + 1 = 0
2 = 0
1 = 0
1 + 1 = 1

as you say its false proof which your right there, using representatives for the numbers etc which is not the issue here.
back in baby school if you answered 2+2=5 you either get laughed at or moved to special aid classes.
i for one will only teach my 4 year old 2+2 = 4 and leave it at that.

~>Dg<~ · 21 Sep 2007 at 14:43

all we or others are saying is it is possible to do the sum which some say it isnt.
in a lamens everyday sit on a couch scratching my nuts kinda a way(which is me

) 2 +2 is 4. just depends how you look at it.made the old grey matter work though for a minute didnt it.

but you can make 2 +2 = 5 whether you like it or not.

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 14:47

dgmug said:
all we or others are saying is it is possible to do the sum which some say it isnt.
in a lamens everyday sit on a couch scratching my nuts kinda a way(which is me ) 2 +2 is 4. just depends how you look at it.made the old grey matter work though for a minute didnt it. but you can make 2 +2 = 5 whether you like it or not.

yes i do get what your saying that 5 is a possible answer BUT you have to do the sum in a totally different way to whats written on paper.
you won;t be going into an exam which has something like "answer the following question: 2+2 = ?" and putting the answer 5 in there. i can;t really see other parents teaching thier kids 2+2 = 5, its maddness i tell ya, pure maddness!!!!!!

~>Dg<~ · 21 Sep 2007 at 14:48

this is ocuk , madness is statuary for all members whove been here long enough.

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 14:54

lol true, only on ocuk can the impossible become possible.

MumboJumbo · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:03

8igdave said:
I may just be able to accept your gift.
Instine did try prove it equalled 5 but his logic is flawed because to do so you must have to divide by 0, which is not possible.

Cyber-Mav said:
as you say its false proof which your right there, using representatives for the numbers etc which is not the issue here.
back in baby school if you answered 2+2=5 you either get laughed at or moved to special aid classes.
i for one will only teach my 4 year old 2+2 = 4 and leave it at that.

As i said right from the start. Its false proof. You are the one who has made your self look like a total ass by going round saying anyone that can get 2+2=5 is a retard. When infact you havn't got a clue about the maths behind it and are talking out your ass as it seems you do ever so oftern.

dgmug said:
all we or others are saying is it is possible to do the sum which some say it isnt.
in a lamens everyday sit on a couch scratching my nuts kinda a way(which is me ) 2 +2 is 4. just depends how you look at it.made the old grey matter work though for a minute didnt it. but you can make 2 +2 = 5 whether you like it or not.

Exacly right.

You should learn to accept that others may be right once in a while.

frankmcg said:
a = 1
b = 1

a = b
a2 = b2
a2 - b2 = 0
(a-b)(a+b) = 0
(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0
(a+b) = 0
1 + 1 = 0
2 = 0
1 = 0
1 + 1 = 1

Well done

You solved the puzzle, although i have seen it down a separate way. Same outcome.

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:07

i still say 2+2=4 not 5

all that stuff posted by frankmcg:

a = 1
b = 1

a = b
a2 = b2
a2 - b2 = 0
(a-b)(a+b) = 0
(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0
(a+b) = 0
1 + 1 = 0
2 = 0
1 = 0
1 + 1 = 1

will probably give you 5
but its totally different from 2+2
guess 8igdave has your age listed in it.

false proof is still false at the end of the day/

MumboJumbo · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:12

You still dont get it do you. You are the only one to have shown that your mental age does not equate to your physical age.

Im done arguing, the point has been prooven. You are just to ignorant to accept it. Back to talking about the game.

How big do you think the download will achualy be? Because if its anything like POE the servers are going to be jam packed :| Wonder if they will let us download it early and give us a password for it on the day of release.

~>Dg<~ · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:15

well if its a limited download to paying sites for the demo you can kiss my crysis good by.i think it will be available everywhere to download just depends how much they want to rape us.

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:16

we know the size of the beta is 1.4gb big, so with added AI some scripting and probably a different level it should still be under 2gigs. but if the demo does not contain any debugging code and is clear of other clutter then it could be around 1.6 gig big possibly less.

MumboJumbo · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:23

thats not so big. Is the current demon avalible on places like bittorrnet? it must be surely.

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:35

i got the beta 2 client which was 1.4gig from torrentspy so it is available over the bittorrent network. quick too in transfer speed.

~>Dg<~ · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:38

yes the current one is was gunna dl it probably take 1 hr but no key so pointless really, suprised no ones hacked it yet.

Gerard · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:46

The sp demo will probably be a bit bigger because of physics coding, more enemies\model variation, sound effects for said enemies, textures, animation files etc.

For some reason i thought monday was the 25th

Scougar · 21 Sep 2007 at 15:52

"Obviously most of us know this is coming in two weeks. But how are you hopeing or expecting it to run. I just got a GTX so Im hope to get nearest to max as possible with my current spec @ 1680x1050. Im really looking forward to seeing if this really is well optimized as they say etc. Should be really good. Hoping for at least 4xAA/16xAF also. Does anyone have a link with some videos running on a GTX system?"

That is the original post. If this goes much further down the pan, can a mod move it to off-topic please?

Matthew

Cyber-Mav · 21 Sep 2007 at 16:11

anyone with a gtx should not worry at all it will run good. it works ok on a x1950pro and [email protected] when i tested the beta.

does anyone know if its a shader model 3.0 game only? or will it scale back to shader model 2 also?

bakes0310 · 21 Sep 2007 at 16:27

I would like to play it at max dx9 settings, my rig is in my sig but ill mention it anyway:

e6600
4gb ram
x1900xtx
Playing at 1280x1024

martin9887 · 21 Sep 2007 at 16:35

Cyber-Mav said:
does anyone know if its a shader model 3.0 game only? or will it scale back to shader model 2 also?

It will indeed, 9800Pro is in the minimum requirements.

silversurfer · 21 Sep 2007 at 17:16

Pretty certain I read sm3 is needed. 9800pro has sm3 ? I thought 6600gt was the lowest.

I think bioshock was a recent example of another game that needs sm3

martin9887 · 21 Sep 2007 at 17:21

silversurfer said:
Pretty certain I read sm3 is needed. 9800pro has sm3 ? I thought 6600gt was the lowest.

I think bioshock was a recent example of another game that needs sm3

I read the opposite, saying it will scale back to SM2

.