Okay, will do.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
CRYSIS vs. The Modern GPU (Part 1)
- Thread starter Big.Wayne
- Start date
Okay, will do.
28/11/2007 10:36:34 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1024x768, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=4, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality:
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=High
Texture=High
ObjectDetail=High
Sound=High
Shadows=High
Water=High
Physics=High
Particles=High
Shading=High
PostProcessing=High
GameEffects=High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 133.15s, Average FPS: 15.02
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 25.39 at frame 974
Average Tri/Sec: -11039624, Tri/Frame: -734936
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.25
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 104.02s, Average FPS: 19.23
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 26.87 at frame 69
Average Tri/Sec: -13947977, Tri/Frame: -725454
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 99.42s, Average FPS: 20.12
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 28.81 at frame 68
Average Tri/Sec: -14620184, Tri/Frame: -726747
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 98.21s, Average FPS: 20.37
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 28.81 at frame 68
Average Tri/Sec: -14788202, Tri/Frame: -726151
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
28/11/2007 10:36:34 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.906666666666666666666666667
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1024x768, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=4, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality:
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=High
Texture=High
ObjectDetail=High
Sound=High
Shadows=High
Water=High
Physics=High
Particles=High
Shading=High
PostProcessing=High
GameEffects=High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 133.15s, Average FPS: 15.02
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 25.39 at frame 974
Average Tri/Sec: -11039624, Tri/Frame: -734936
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.25
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 104.02s, Average FPS: 19.23
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 26.87 at frame 69
Average Tri/Sec: -13947977, Tri/Frame: -725454
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 99.42s, Average FPS: 20.12
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 28.81 at frame 68
Average Tri/Sec: -14620184, Tri/Frame: -726747
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 98.21s, Average FPS: 20.37
Min FPS: 0.00 at frame 1991, Max FPS: 28.81 at frame 68
Average Tri/Sec: -14788202, Tri/Frame: -726151
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
28/11/2007 10:36:34 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.906666666666666666666666667
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,341
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
Cool thanks 
I just copied and pasted from the resulting text file, everything was on medium.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,341
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
Im just comparing it to my 8600gts at stock clocks, oc and oc2. It compares well to the 3850 there infact its the same fps.
I expect the 3850 scales much better when overclocked where the gts hits a wall
Reducing the gts clocks by 11% reduces the fps by 8%
You need to rename any custom config file you have setup btw otherwise it wont compare right
Is that at high quality. I wonder when we'll see a game get better fps in dx10 then 9, if ever..
I expect the 3850 scales much better when overclocked where the gts hits a wall
Reducing the gts clocks by 11% reduces the fps by 8%
You need to rename any custom config file you have setup btw otherwise it wont compare right
Is that at high quality. I wonder when we'll see a game get better fps in dx10 then 9, if ever..
Last edited:
Been reading most of the post in this thread and the results from systems compared to anothers seem quite random, with some lower spec systems not be far behind a top of the range system. Maybe/Hopefully there shall be a an update released soon that my increase performance??, Remember how much of a dog S.t.a.l.k.e.r was with version one, with the update performance was increase by quite a margin, so hopefully the same will happen here
Hi lettuce, would you care to quote any examples?
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 2,636
- Location
- Wicklow, Ireland
Yeah, but the lower spec system (3850 + X2 3800) was tested at Medium settings, while the higher end systems were tested with High settings.
To get an accurate comparison, we'd need to see the different cards all tested on the same rig with identical game settings.
That's what I've done with all my tests? 8800GT/2900XT/X1800XT(6600LE?) submitted so far
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 2,636
- Location
- Wicklow, Ireland
Yeah, but other people have contributed scores too, like Carter above, and you also posted fornowagain's results..
just set us a crossfire hd3850 and [email protected] XP system, what would be the best res and detail settings for a useful compare peeps ?
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,341
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
Do everything in this screenshot and then again at high or just high if you think all the fps will be reasonable
What program makes these charts, its a website?
What program makes these charts, its a website?
Do everything in this screenshot and then again at high or just high if you think all the fps will be reasonable
What program makes these charts, its a website?
err ok , get back to you tomorrow
just did a quick run 1024x768 all med scored 53/60/60/60 average, default gpu speeds
No thats done with MS Excel
Nope. In fact I even doubt the next generation GPU could do that at 50FPS.
However, on High settings there is already a blur effect that makes most jaggies unnoticeable. Although you'll still be playing under 30FPS..
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 82.31s, Average FPS: 24.30
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 159, Max FPS: 31.15 at frame 343
Average Tri/Sec: 17268450, Tri/Frame: 710722
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.29
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 80.48s, Average FPS: 24.85
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 159, Max FPS: 31.15 at frame 343
Average Tri/Sec: 17868530, Tri/Frame: 719022
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.27
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
28/11/2007 21:50:52 - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1024x768 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 24.85
I require a new gfx card =(
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 82.31s, Average FPS: 24.30
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 159, Max FPS: 31.15 at frame 343
Average Tri/Sec: 17268450, Tri/Frame: 710722
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.29
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 80.48s, Average FPS: 24.85
Min FPS: 15.48 at frame 159, Max FPS: 31.15 at frame 343
Average Tri/Sec: 17868530, Tri/Frame: 719022
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.27
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
28/11/2007 21:50:52 - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1024x768 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 24.85
I require a new gfx card =(
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,341
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
WHat is your gfx card? Most people measured in dx9 because 10 is harder to do, is it a 8600gt?
My system:
XP PRO
ASUS A8N-SLI
AMD Athlon X2 4800+
3GB DDR RAM
7900GTX 512.
29/11/2007 09:51:00 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 98.25s, Average FPS: 20.36
Min FPS: 10.90 at frame 258, Max FPS: 28.35 at frame 1776
Average Tri/Sec: 17675762, Tri/Frame: 868307
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.06
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
29/11/2007 09:51:00 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 20.36
Now i have played this level both in the demo and retail game, at the same res as about, but with half the settings on high and the other half medium, so the average fps would have been less one would have though, but by no means does it feel like i was getting an average fps of 20!!, felt more liek 30. So what the hell is going on with this game, are the caculalations for working out the fps on this game screwed up or something??
XP PRO
ASUS A8N-SLI
AMD Athlon X2 4800+
3GB DDR RAM
7900GTX 512.
29/11/2007 09:51:00 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 98.25s, Average FPS: 20.36
Min FPS: 10.90 at frame 258, Max FPS: 28.35 at frame 1776
Average Tri/Sec: 17675762, Tri/Frame: 868307
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.06
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
29/11/2007 09:51:00 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 20.36
Now i have played this level both in the demo and retail game, at the same res as about, but with half the settings on high and the other half medium, so the average fps would have been less one would have though, but by no means does it feel like i was getting an average fps of 20!!, felt more liek 30. So what the hell is going on with this game, are the caculalations for working out the fps on this game screwed up or something??
Last edited: