• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CRYSIS vs. The Modern GPU (Part 1)

I posted these in the GT thread, but i will pop them here also.
Asus 8800GT @ 650/950 (1900). No idea on shader. Simply upped the sliders in nTune. :D

Looking at other results, these seem about right.

3D Mark06

11037

Crysis. 1280x1024, all settings high, No AA/AF

Min Fps 21.63

Max Fps 48.17

Average Fps 39.93

That will do me nicely. ;)

Rest of spec as sig. XPsp2
 
Countcussy said:
Average Fps 39.93

That will do me nicely. ;)

Rest of spec as sig. XPsp2
Click to expand...

I got an average of 37.12FPS in XP, 42.53FPS running SLI.
Is Crysis not really benefiting from dual GPU? Heard about a patch coming out?
That said there are big FPS differences once you start adding AA between single and Dual cards.
 
dr. sarf said:
I got an average of 37.12FPS in XP, 42.53FPS running SLI.
Is Crysis not really benefiting from dual GPU? Heard about a patch coming out?
That said there are big FPS differences once you start adding AA between single and Dual cards.
Click to expand...

Never really bothered with AA/AF to be honest. Probably because i have never had a card capable enough :D

1280 x 1024 looks very good on my 19" crt as is, which is good enough for me. ;)
 
crysisx1800xtallnv3.jpg


gpuzx1800xthm1.jpg
 
Last edited:
silversurfer said:
How did you collect the fps data, fraps?
Click to expand...
No just used the games in-built benchmark. The results are dumped to a text file.

However I just found this cool new app today, wish It had been out a few weeks ago!

Crysis Benchmark Tool 1.05 Final

Click image to download

Also allowed me to pick the widescreen resolutions that were missing in-game.
 
Last edited:
Its a really good benchmark tool this, unfortunately the actual crysis benchmark doesn't represent the FPS you will be getting in the last third of the game. With settings i can get 30fps in the benchmark are crippled to as low as 4fps in the last scenes :( Cant wait to replay the game in 2 years time.
 
Jabbs said:
Deffo some peeps talking out of there rear ends we shall say at 1280x960 on a 8800gt and a quad core 6600@ 3.15 and 4 gig ram(shows 3.5gig) if i put aa on there is no way in hell its playable its barely playable in places on high without aa.
Click to expand...

i have quad core and 8800GT any AA at all makes it unplayable, it just slows down like its in slow motion :(
 
Just benchmarked my 2 bfg oc in sli at stock and got the following.

26/11/2007 15:31:16 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Custom
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=High
Texture=High
ObjectDetail=High
Sound=Medium
Shadows=Low
Water=High
Physics=High
Particles=High
Shading=High
PostProcessing=High
GameEffects=High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 56.73s, Average FPS: 35.25
Min FPS: 20.68 at frame 138, Max FPS: 49.45 at frame 1561
Average Tri/Sec: 33473830, Tri/Frame: 949492
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.97
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 47.60s, Average FPS: 42.02
Min FPS: 20.68 at frame 138, Max FPS: 52.44 at frame 116
Average Tri/Sec: 40480724, Tri/Frame: 963389
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.95
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 45.81s, Average FPS: 43.66
Min FPS: 20.68 at frame 138, Max FPS: 53.97 at frame 112
Average Tri/Sec: 42090580, Tri/Frame: 964012
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.95
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

26/11/2007 15:31:16 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 42.84
 
Weird results

My rig is a BFG 8800GT OC, 4800X2 @ 2.9Ghz and 2GB ram WinXP

I get the following in the gpu benchmark, no AA:

1024x768 Medium: 45.5 High: 35.5

1920x1200 Medium: 40.5 High: 24.6

Overclocking the GT to 675/2000 gives 26.4 1900x1200@high

My scores on high at 1920x1200 are in line with the OP but the medium ones are lower, I wonder if I am CPU limited at these lower settings?
 
Big.Wayne said:
Hi peahead, any chance you could do some more tests pls? but this time set everything to Medium and do a run then set everything to High and do another run, thanks! :)
Click to expand...

This is with medium

26/11/2007 18:47:09 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Custom
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=Medium
Texture=Medium
ObjectDetail=Medium
Sound=Medium
Shadows=Medium
Water=Medium
Physics=Medium
Particles=Medium
Shading=Medium
PostProcessing=Medium
GameEffects=Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 35.62s, Average FPS: 56.15
Min FPS: 40.23 at frame 1942, Max FPS: 85.08 at frame 1613
Average Tri/Sec: 50599620, Tri/Frame: 901117
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.02
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 30.51s, Average FPS: 65.56
Min FPS: 38.81 at frame 1963, Max FPS: 91.80 at frame 1650
Average Tri/Sec: 59628692, Tri/Frame: 909521
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.01
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 30.60s, Average FPS: 65.37
Min FPS: 38.81 at frame 1963, Max FPS: 95.73 at frame 122
Average Tri/Sec: 59517376, Tri/Frame: 910481
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.01
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

26/11/2007 18:47:09 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 65.465
 
Last edited:
And now with all high settings

26/11/2007 18:53:51 - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Custom
Custom Quality Values:
VolumetricEffects=High
Texture=High
ObjectDetail=High
Sound=Medium
Shadows=High
Water=High
Physics=High
Particles=High
Shading=High
PostProcessing=High
GameEffects=High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 57.06s, Average FPS: 35.05
Min FPS: 19.67 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 47.97 at frame 870
Average Tri/Sec: -26399276, Tri/Frame: -753133
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.22
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 48.60s, Average FPS: 41.16
Min FPS: 19.67 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 55.44 at frame 85
Average Tri/Sec: -30916574, Tri/Frame: -751201
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.22
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 47.96s, Average FPS: 41.70
Min FPS: 19.67 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 57.97 at frame 83
Average Tri/Sec: -31288192, Tri/Frame: -750342
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.22
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

26/11/2007 18:53:51 - XP
Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Custom ~~ Overall Average FPS: 41.43
 
Here's a strange one. I was messing with the settings and found that I could run the game at what looked about 10fps with everything set to Very High. Looked lovely but the jitteryness was ridiculous - and that was at the start of the game!

So I set it all to high with no AA/AF and it ran lovely and smooth (for me at least). I thought, I know, I'll try some AA to make it look purdy. I jacked it up to max and of course the frame rates dived to abaout 5fps. Unfortunatley when I put it back down to no AA, the frame rates were still abysmal. I had to quit the game and restart to get it back to normal. Just a thought guys when you're playing with the settings - seems that if you change a lot and dont restart the game it has an adverse affect on your fps.
 
8600GTS OC

Big.Wayne said:
crysisx1800xtallnv3.jpg
Click to expand...

VS

a 8600GTS OC

Min FPS: 25.36 , Max FPS: 60.04


Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 42.655
Click to expand...




Min FPS: 24.31, Max FPS: 37.65

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.735
Click to expand...


Min FPS: 17.80 , Max FPS: 26.60

Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.675
Click to expand...


Min FPS: 14.15, Max FPS: 27.06

Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 20.69
Click to expand...



Nice that a 8600gts can beat a 1800xt even at high res, can it top a x1950pro also?











straxusii said:
My rig is a BFG 8800GT OC, 4800X2 @ 2.9Ghz and 2GB ram WinXP

I get the following in the gpu benchmark, no AA:

1024x768 Medium: 45.5
Click to expand...

3 fps higher then my 8600gts :confused:
:D
 
Last edited:
straxusii said:
My rig is a BFG 8800GT OC, 4800X2 @ 2.9Ghz and 2GB ram WinXP

I get the following in the gpu benchmark, no AA:

1024x768 Medium: 45.5 High: 35.5

1920x1200 Medium: 40.5 High: 24.6

Overclocking the GT to 675/2000 gives 26.4 1900x1200@high

My scores on high at 1920x1200 are in line with the OP but the medium ones are lower, I wonder if I am CPU limited at these lower settings?
Click to expand...

Better than mine.

I get 45 fps a 1680 x 1050 medium and 25 fps at high.

That's with my AMD 4200x2 at 3.014 Ghz and my 8800 GT at 750/1758/1950.

Any chance you can run yours at 1680 x 1050 to compare?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom