Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra performance

[g67575]

Yup, its very demanding:

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uP6tZYGcGvQkw76YLjqoji-970-80.png

**Do Not Hot link images **

The RTX 3060 TI is still hitting 60 fps min. though. You need a decent CPU to play at a constant 60 fps, 7700k won't cut it.

Edit -Full article here:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cyberpunk-2077-performance-preview

 

[chroniclard]

Turn down to high, not notice any difference, profit.

 

[diamount]

Was this with or without drivers?

 

[olevam]

What does 770k mean?
Oh, I get it - CPU - any tests with a 3070?

 

[mrbios]

The RTX 3060 TI is still hitting 60 fps min. though. You need a decent CPU to play at 60 fps, 7700k won't cut it.

What CPU are they using in that benchmark?
EDIT: ah i9 9900k

 

[Aretak]

Gamers Nexus has already said that these performance numbers are invalid.

https://twitter.com/GamersNexus/status/1336066826233651202

Just more shoddy clickbait from Tom's Hardware.

 

[Grim5]

Lol 1080p, I only play at 4k

 

[kinger8938]

Is this with RTX on? And also I guess without the huge day one patch etc

 

[mrbios]

Is this with RTX on? And also I guess without the huge day one patch etc

Just had a look at the toms hardware page with it all on, there's some RTX and DLSS stuff on there as well as 1440p and 4k stuff. Though like Aretak pointed out, pre-release DRM (which will be removed upon release) will be hampering performance quite heavily.

 

[montymint]

Lol 1080p, I only play at 4k

 

[g67575]

Turn down to high, not notice any difference, profit.

Partly agree. Maybe game developers could adopt the standard of adding a 'console quality' option in games, so you are at least meeting that level of quality.

Maybe they don't like to draw attention to fact that 'high' / 'ultra' on PC games is often superior to console versions.

 

[Brazo]

Lol 1080p, I only play at 4k

Same here I suspect it will be a slide show on my 3080!

 

[willhub]

Gamers Nexus has already said that these performance numbers are invalid.

https://twitter.com/GamersNexus/status/1336066826233651202

Just more shoddy clickbait from Tom's Hardware.

Why invalid?

 

[g67575]

The DRM can't be that bad surely? maybe reduce CPU performance 5-10%?

 

[Howling]

Why invalid?

If you click the link then you'll see. But basically it has some super denuvo **** that leaches resources... but also - there's no Day 1 patch and there's no drivers for it, so I'd take any results with a pinch of salt anyway.

 

[g67575]

4770k at min. 47 FPS is still playable

I guess 4K 60 FPS will have to wait, right now you can get min. 34 FPS at 4k ultra with an RTX 3080:

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/m3k2BqyYYVPmm6mkVYnnJj-970-80.png

**Do Not Hot link images **

 

[mrbios]

The DRM can't be that bad surely? maybe reduce CPU performance 5-10%?

Obviously varies game by game and the implementation of the DRM, and even what DRM it is, but i've seen some crazy FPS increases in the past thanks to the removal of Denuvo.

EDIT: Though have to also say, have seen instances where removing DRM had little to no affect at all. So can't really compare to the past, just got to wait for the benchmarks to tell us the true story of it.

 

[g67575]

Obviously varies game by game and the implementation of the DRM, and even what DRM it is, but i've seen some crazy FPS increases in the past thanks to the removal of Denuvo.

Thing is- There's a large performance drop at 4K. Can't see why DRM would cause this.

 

[varkanoid]

Lol 1080p, I only play at 4k

article has others reckons 3060ti 43fps min 1440p Ultra

 

[g67575]

its possible that the beta build isnt that well optimized... more likely to significantly reduce performance than DRM.

But it looks like its just a very cpu intensive game based on these results.

The game probably benefits heavily from 6-8 cpu cores, especially at lower resolutions