Yea but m point is nothing to do with whether its they can tell the difference. its to with the fact that people who are already spending x amount can most likely spend a 1/3 more to get a better product.
i bet those who paid 1.5k pc had a budget of say 1k/1.2k but decided umm if i spent a couple of hundred quid more, i can add thiss, add that, get a better gpu, more storage etc etc
Same with d800/d600. umm if i spend extra £500 i can get double MP, weather sealing, beter ergonimics and handling and better AF system. umm interesting prospect. let me wait a month of two and save and get a d800! im nearly there anway. already got 1.5k lying around. lets do this
whether that product benefits them is not the issue. the fact is, spend a little, potentially gain a little. Your telling me u never in your life spent a little to gain a little for anything or do u always set out on a budget X andNEVER go above that at all?
come on man.
This is not a comparison on what a d600 and d800 can or cannot do or what gains can be had or loss. this is about the "potential" of gaining a little more by spending a little more.
its as simple as that.
Do not overcomplicate my point lol
You're the one that overcomplicated it. The D800 is not an entry level camera, the D600 is and is
£500+ cheaper.
..
Pause to let that sink in a bit as you obviously missed it.
£500. On a salary of £30,000 per year, after taxes but with no other contributions, you'd need to work for a fortnight without spending a penny on
anything - no bills, no food, no transport, no clothing, etc - to earn that. So even a living-at-home rent-free bachelor with no life and minimal spending is going to need a few weeks to save that extra bit for it. Fine for him, but the rest of the world that have dependents, cars, travel costs, food costs, rent/mortgages etc. £500 is a fortune.