In fairness though, unless they did something completely mental, i'd have thought that dashcam or otherwise, a cyclist not being very visible is unlikely to resolve you from blame if you hit one?
Might not resolve you of blame depending on circumstances but it can make a difference - hitting a cyclist tends to be very much a one way street for a driver without any supporting evidence.
Edit - if anything, if your dashcam is showing improved visibility, it would only have the opposite effect and make it look like you hit a clearly visible cyclist?
Unfortunately yes - I had one awhile back where the dashcam footage the sky looks blue (in reality it was dark) and the cyclist is visible albeit not clear whereas in person you could literally only see the white of their socks until the headlights were on them and being a hill the headlights were off angle and only caught them late.