days in a year

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:25

DRZ said:
Look at my post above - the reason is in bold and underlined for you. Nice and simple

but that means i have to be there 3 years to recoup the money.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:31

ok ive counted the weeks from last year to this year theres 52 payments all have been £149.50, now there £26 is missing, i cant make it more simple than that.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:35

ok they are telling me that a full year is 52 weeks, but they calculated it by days.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:38

but the contract was for £650 a month 12 months = 1 year but they paid me weekly and done the calculation based on days in a year.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:48

ok your not seeing it?
The contract was £650 per month for 12 months= 650x 12 = £7800 (52 weekly payments of £150 = £7800)but they started to pay me weekly 52 payments when in of £149.50 = £7774.

Now they said they add it all up and calculated the daily rate and convert it into a week.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:52

Freefaller said:
Exactly... So if you're getting paid by the week, you no longer have a yearly salary of £7800.

it is a yearly cuz the contract say £650 per month for 12 months.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 18:55

drz go back re read what i have posted, yoru not getting or seeing it.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:05

DRZ said:
You have been underpaid by 50p per week if you signed a 52 week contract for £7800. This has NOTHING to do with days in a year, it is a clerical error on their part.

If you signed a 1 year contract, you have not been underpaid and your payslip for "week 53" should contain the remainder.

This is absolutely crystal clear to just about everyone here but you!

i know ive been underpaid well done for noticing it been trying to tell you guys from the start, now the other part you havent seen was they said there is ONLY 52 weeks in the year, they calculated it on days 365 then covert the days into a week then payme on a weekly basis for 52 weeks

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:10

They are saying we have paid your 52 weeks and we have paid you £7800
but they are calculating it by days.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:11

DRZ said:
Like I said, assuming 52 weeks = 1 year is a clerical error.

IF you signed a 52 week contract and they have been paying you weekly based on a year then they were wrong to do that.

If you signed to a year where 1 year = 365.25 days then you are wrong and they are right to pay you as you have been paid.

iam trying to expalin that too them but they cant see it.

she is doing £7800 / 365 * 7= weekly rate = £149.50
the contract is £650 per month for 1 year= £7800 weekly rate= £150

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:17

the problem is my contract is on a monthly basis for a year they pay weekly, for a year, thats my problem and its leaving me out of pocket, because the way it all done. At last some can see it.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:20

ive been trying to she sticks to her calculation what can i do.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:22

crashuk said:
We all know theres 365 days in a year right well your wrong. theres 364 days in a year if theres 52 weeks in a year and 7 days in a week.
364days / 52 weeks = 7 days a week.

To have 365 days in a year we need to either divide 365 day in a year / 7days in a week = 52.14 weeks in a year and divide that by 7 should give you 7.44 days in a week.

so we have 7.44 days in week.

and then ive been using this to show her if the payments are for 52 weeks only then this method should be used, because my contract is on a monthly basis for 12 months.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:24

woodsy2k said:
Totally and utterly wasted tbh! OP, seriously dude, come on. Astrophysicists have worked it out, oh i dont know...... Pretty damn accuratly?! If i were you my friend i would properly research the matter before saying, "Well your wrong"

Woody

dude everyone got it wrong apart from 2 members, so i dont know what your talking about. the problem here is about converting months to year to days then to a week and then showing them where they have gone wrong, most if not all got it wrong and should go and re do maths again.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:32

Roduga said:
You are getting 2 different questions a little mixed up...

what questions are they

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 19:40

Roduga said:
The 'date' question and the 'pay calculation' question.

actually my 2nd post was about both and how it should be worked out, date and pay were related to show and help people understand what i was on about.

The real dislike was that every jumps onboard as a critic and then later on disappears when its starts to fall in place, and thats the main problem iam having at the moment. Try to explain about the difference between months and weeks, just cant seem to get her to understand because she keeps repeating this is how we do it, and me iam not on a weekly contract but monthly for one year.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 20:22

Freefaller said:
We've given you all the answers you could possibly want - I think people are also fed up of repeating themselves, hence why they have "disappeared".

the point was relating months to a year then to days then in to weeks and this was linked to money, which has a different effect on the whole year and how a month is calculated via days in a year, that was my main point.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 20:23

Vertigo1 said:
Jesus wept

149.50 , 52 times dosent not equal to £7800.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 21:05

yes if the contract said weekly the contract says i should be paid £650 a month for 12 months, so days in the year shouldnt affect it in anyway and should be calculated base on months not days, i just see it as a cheap way not to pay me for that day, but they like to pay weekly.

crashuk · 15 Apr 2006 at 21:20

vertigo1 i understand, but the key is 650 per month for 12 months (1jan-31 dec) not 650 for 11 months and 30 days.