- Joined
- 12 Feb 2013
- Posts
- 462
- Location
- Cumbria
Hopefully. I'm only a mile away from the DPD when at hospital but 20 when I'm at home. Hope I don't drive home then have to come backSounds like a tough situation. Hope she's able to recover well.
Hopefully. I'm only a mile away from the DPD when at hospital but 20 when I'm at home. Hope I don't drive home then have to come backSounds like a tough situation. Hope she's able to recover well.
Sounds like a tough situation. Hope she's able to recover well.
Sounds like a tough situation. Hope she's able to recover well.
Sounds good. All cores are now at similar temperatures to one another? The previous issue, where you had a big and consistent temperature variance across cores, is often due to the heat not being transferred from the CPU die to IHS properly.seems like the repair has worked (although havent clocked it to 5GHz yet just at 4.9) max temp in cinebench 68 and prime which ony ran for 10 minutes with 1344FFT was 75
Nice.yep as I type core 0 29 core 1 29 core 2 30 core 3 29 core 4 30 core 5 29. Core temps not jumping around as much either
Personally, I wouldn't consider that stable. I'd continue to tweak the overclock settings because I'd rather have a slightly slower clock speed, but with the peace of mind that it's more stable. Just my own preference though.but heres the odd one Prime 95 v26 temp never gets above 75 but it blue screens after 1 hour 55 minutes
Personally, I wouldn't consider that stable. I'd continue to tweak the overclock settings because I'd rather have a slightly slower clock speed, but with the peace of mind that it's more stable. Just my own preference though.
Try Vcore 1.35V to see if that helps stability.I'm not sure what else I can tweak apart from vcore. Maybe I will try upping it.
Try Vcore 1.35V to see if that helps stability.
I would just leave it at 4.9GHz. It's only 100MHz difference.It fails at 3 hours in prime with 1.35v and 1.36. I dont think I did well in the silicone lottery
However 4.9 does not fail
I would just leave it at 4.9MHz. It's only 100MHz difference.
Mine needs 1.35v to be 100% stable at 5ghz. It will run lower but with the odd crash in any application.
The thermal limit hasn't been reached, but looks like it might still not be enough voltage for that frequency. Assuming it's stable, I'd just leave it at 4.9GHz and not worry about it any further.yeah am doing. Not sure why it fails at 5GHz as temps never go passed 80c. Have done several tests on prime and blue screens with a different error every time.
The thermal limit hasn't been reached, but looks like it might still not be enough voltage for that frequency. Assuming it's stable, I'd just leave it at 4.9MHz and not worry about it any further.
yeah am doing. Not sure why it fails at 5GHz as temps never go passed 80c. Have done several tests on prime and blue screens with a different error every time.
can you confirm load mhz speed and max core voltage after a cinebench 20 multicore run ? i would use hwinfo and coretemp. post the score here.
go into bios and confirm llc setting.
doing an avxclock offset might be what
you need if the chip is not strong enough at 5ghz avx. there is a more complex method of using a voltage offset for avx if your board has it.