Derek Chauvin murder trial (Police officer who arrested George Floyd)

Status
Not open for further replies.
4 officers present against one man.
Derek didn’t need to use that method of and level of restraint for 9 minutes.
Whilst the suspect complained over 30 times they couldn’t breathe, only to be pretty much ignored.

Derek didn’t give a flying **** good riddance.

Some of the reactions to this verdict are very telling.
 
This minnesota attorney giving a speech about how George Floyd was a law abiding citizen, a loved man with a loving family. Pity he forgot to mention about the gun Floyd pointed at a pregnant woman's stomach while her house was ransacked by his mates.
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
We'll see won't we. If any officer thought that what DC did was right then they had no business being a cop and hopefully when they leave they can be replaced with officers who actually want to protect and serve and will be better trained and more psychologically suitable for the job. The fact remains there were lots of officers on that witness list. They never normally testify against their own, that says a lot about what they think of DC. Lets not forget he had 18 complaints against him before this.
Click to expand...

That also doesn't negate the point! You don't need to believe that what he did was right to also believe that 2nd-degree murder was a dodgy conviction or that the way these things are handled currently in the media and by some politicians (including local politicians in that city) is dubious. There were three other cops with him too and they all lost their jobs without due process because the mayor threw them under the bus immediately.

As for "well will see" we already have seen, it already started happening last year, this verdict isn't going to change that - why would it?
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
We'll see won't we. If any officer thought that what DC did was right then they had no business being a cop and hopefully when they leave they can be replaced with officers who actually want to protect and serve and will be better trained and more psychologically suitable for the job. The fact remains there were lots of officers on that witness list. They never normally testify against their own, that says a lot about what they think of DC. Lets not forget he had 18 complaints against him before this.
Click to expand...

I wondered when this disingenuine fact would come up again.

18 complaints spanning a 20+ year career, so less than one a year. I would suspect that's less than average for a cop in the US.
 
This thread is an absolute joke. There are posters in here who claim to have watched the whole case and said no way is he guilty, now he's guilty and its clear as day they didn't even understand the charges. If any of you ever get called up for jury duty just tell the judge you aren't fit to serve on a jury.
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
That is a ridiculous thing to say. So because he didn't take him out of sight and give him a kicking he didn't want to assault him? Did you type that and think, yeah that is a good post?
Click to expand...

No, if that was his intention he could have roughed him up out of sight or once he was back out on bail. The suspect was no angel, they deal with people like this all the time. He had no reason to go soft on someone using up police resources that would have been needed elsewhere.
 
Chuck the book at the rancid scum:

CkE6t7a.png
 
Resident said:
I wondered when this disingenuine fact would come up again.

18 complaints spanning a 20+ year career, so less than one a year. I would suspect that's less than average for a cop in the US.
Click to expand...

And don't forget the four commendations/medals for valour....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom