Poor excuse chap.
Dinosaurs are not real :(
- Thread starter stoke1863
- Start date
He was a National Science Foundation Fellow. He has taught college courses in physics, mathematics, and computer science.
I seriously doubt this and yes I read the article
He's sort of correct, but I think he worded it wrong, they have mammoth DNA and there are plans to input it into an elephant, but the result will probably just be a wooly elephant lol
It's not about defeat, or belittling etc etc, it's about the correct information and truth, that is all. Dr Walt Brown wanted a book on the subject for educational purposes, that is all. But no-one will engage in the written debate
It's not about defeat, or belittling etc etc, it's about the correct information and truth, that is all. Dr Walt Brown wanted a book on the subject for educational purposes, that is all. But no-one will engage in the written debate
How do you expect me to engage with you, when your retort to my point was 'a nautilus is not a human'?
That may be so but many evolutinists do. Just two weeks ago i saw a program on TV where the scientist claimed that there was once nothing and everything came from nothing, from nothing came everything over eons of evolutionary time and all by unguided random chemical accidents.
LOLKEDGE.
No they dont.
The nautilus is not a human
But Jesus is a human right? How is a human made without any human sperm?
If Jesus had been alive today, what would a DNA test reveal, that he is the son of a biological human male and female, or that he is some kind of alien with non human DNA?
So, no biology then?
Anyway, I said what he proposes isn't science. Not that he himself isn't a scientist (even in a mostly unrelated field).
Last edited:
My apologies dear fellow. The human eye is different from that of the nautilus. The point was though from what i understand is the eye be it human or the nautilus is that it is fully functioning, it works. I'm not an expert on the 20 different types of eyes the same as i'm no expert on the 4 different types of flight mechanisms.
excuse my spelling sometimes
But as I pointed out earlier it simply isn't the case, there are still examples of primitive 'eyes' that can only sense ambient light. These aren't fully functional.
Hell... the human eye isn't fully functional. Can you see the full spectrum of light? 'Cos I can't.
So was Jesus a human or an alien? No one has answered that yet.
Where did his parental DNA come from?
Oh the irony, that coming from a scientifically challenged / ignorant individual such as you.
Where did his parental DNA come from?
Oh the irony, that coming from a scientifically challenged / ignorant individual such as you.
Yes, he also states to see their signed debate agreements
Kedge, I think you may have watched the same documentary that I mentioned earlier but you seem to have missed the point or complexity rather badly. I suppose scientists are saying that we came from nothing because the inference is that all matter (including every atom etc) came into being but that is hardly the point of evolution.
Stephen Baxter wrote a wonderful book called (unsurprisingly) "Evolution". Its a great read and walks through the evolution of humanity from Cretaceous era proto-mammals to human beings in the present day.
Stephen Baxter wrote a wonderful book called (unsurprisingly) "Evolution". Its a great read and walks through the evolution of humanity from Cretaceous era proto-mammals to human beings in the present day.
He's a descendant of David.
Brilliant, hey, now you and many other scientists can prove him wrong...oh wait a minute...hmmm
And Mary gave birth to Jesus as a Virgin? How is this possible?
Turkey baster.