Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I don't really like the idea and don't think fanboys as such are the problem, it's just down to certain users who push it too far.
Fanboyism is highly subjective to some people.Oh I think fanboyism is a problem after all it's just another form of narrow mindedness.
But we don't need seperate forums just do what I do when it gets too much and go to better sites.
i agree but its the can be said about amd and intel too.Fanboyism is highly subjective to some people.
I get called a fanboy for hating on nVidia, for me to hate on nVidia doesn't = love of ATi.
Fanboys hate on a brand for makebelieve reasons, I've lost count of the 'problems' people have invented about ATi cards.
It's not about defending ATi, it's about defending the truth to me.
Some people get told to buy an nVidia card when an ATi alternative will be just as fast but cost about 15-20% cheaper.
This I see as common sense, my wallet contents it more important than what company I align my self to.
As for hating on nVidia, I think they make great hardware, but I don't agree with the blatantly wrong things that they do.
This, I'm entirely entitled to be deeply disappointed in how nVidia operate.
It's not good, anti-competitive, completely un-innovative and downright dirty.
The only people who label me a fanboy for these reasons must surely be the fanboys as I don't know how anyone wouldn't be angry at the things they do.
i agree but its the can be said about amd and intel too.
i agree intel had the edge, but nowadays not so as much. also it's not all about overclocking.You could do, but then arguably, intel have had the edge when it comes to overclocking.
i agree intel had the edge, but nowadays not so as much. also it's not all about overclocking.
overclocking is about luck, doesn't matter if its intel or amd. if i go out tomorrow and buy q6600 and try overcliocking it may only do 3.4ghz. same goes with a amd chip...Oh I know, I mean in terms of the majority of users on here.
I can get my Q6600 to over 4Ghz on air, up from 2.4Ghz, that's what swayed me to the core 2 line of CPUs, and I've had about 5 since 2007.
E6600, E6750, Q6600 and Q6700
The last one is in my laptop, I can't remember what CPU it is off the top of my head though, I just know it's a 1.8Ghz 'pentium dual core' based CPUs.
I've since sold both E6XXX CPUs and I've got the Q6s in my main PC and server PC.
Due to their overclocking potential, the Q6600 has been the best CPU I've ever had.
The best motherbaord I've ever had was DFI NFII Ultra-B, Yes, that's right, an nVidia based motherboard.
Best board I've owned, ever. Soundstorm 2, need I say more?![]()
Gonna have to agree with you there, Lanparty boards were indeed great. The bundles you got with them were second to none.DFI made good boards back then never mind the chipset - lanparty boards ruled... shame they are nothing special any more.
overclocking is about luck, doesn't matter if its intel or amd. if i go out tomorrow and buy q6600 and try overcliocking it may only do 3.4ghz. same goes with a amd chip...
so i must be seeing things because i've seen a lot of q6600 at 3.2-3.4ghz.Not really, generally Intel's Core 2 based chips were great for monster overclocks on air.
A lot of people with highly clocked Q6600s would disagree with the luck part.