re: "white privilege" this notion that white people have special privileges purely because they're white - it could probably be better referred to as "majority advantage" - if we assume that white people are biased towards people of their "race" then being in a majority they'd be privileged right?
The thing is there would seem to be an implicit assumption there that all "races" are biased to the same extent... so if most of society is white and all racial groups have some bias/in-group preference then white people will have some general advantage re: racial bias... on average.
The problem is what if biases among racial groups aren't all distributed in a similar way, what if some groups have higher in group preferences/biases than others... well in that case you can't necessarily assume that just being in a majority gives you advantages on average you might be in a minority that doesn't suffer significant biases from the majority and benefits from strong in-group preferences from others within your minority.
This is quite interesting - recent data from the US:
Well they did and they have but they've also excluded people based on race in addition to that... the point was that the reasoning for the latter was flawed as it was already covered by their exclusion of higher-income people in the first place.
The thing is there would seem to be an implicit assumption there that all "races" are biased to the same extent... so if most of society is white and all racial groups have some bias/in-group preference then white people will have some general advantage re: racial bias... on average.
The problem is what if biases among racial groups aren't all distributed in a similar way, what if some groups have higher in group preferences/biases than others... well in that case you can't necessarily assume that just being in a majority gives you advantages on average you might be in a minority that doesn't suffer significant biases from the majority and benefits from strong in-group preferences from others within your minority.
This is quite interesting - recent data from the US:
Right...but the people running the scheme didn't want to exclude higher-income people.
Well they did and they have but they've also excluded people based on race in addition to that... the point was that the reasoning for the latter was flawed as it was already covered by their exclusion of higher-income people in the first place.