Soldato
I literally have no idea where to begin with that.
I literally have no idea where to begin with that.
Thats direct interfering which god does not do and would prove satan and his followers right.
Doesn't he? He did it to Adam and Eve. Or do you mean he doesn't do it anymore?
Also if he doesn't interfere, what's the point of him? Surely he indirectly interferes by appointing the pope etc. In the same way, he could indirectly interfere by making evil people fall under buses. Nobody could prove it was him.
Many preachers agree nowdays that adam and eve is just a fairy tale and didnt exist,was a rubbish story anyhow as humans evolved from animals in the first place not just one day there was humans like adam and eve.poppy ****
So they pick and choose which bits from the bible they wish to believe . Interesting. I wonder what vonhelmet makes of this, considering he was earlier citing the bible's explanation for why god doesn't stamp out evil. This doesn't suit me so I think I'll disregard it .
So they pick and choose which bits from the bible they wish to believe . Interesting. I wonder what vonhelmet makes of this, considering he was earlier citing the bible's explanation for why god doesn't stamp out evil. This doesn't suit me so I think I'll disregard it .
Sorry robbie,again i dont believe inthe bible its just like a comic to me,if jesus fed the 5000 with what was it 1 fish and loaf of bread,why does god not send one of his beings down to earth to all the people who are starving right now in this world and sort it out once and for all.
why does god not send one of his beings down to earth to all the people who are starving right now in this world and sort it out once and for all.
But even if He reveals evidence of Himself only to benefit us, why isn't He more forthright about it? This much seems clear: If He made His presence or the evidence too obvious, it would interfere with His demonstration, which is intended to draw out or reveal the true inner character of mankind. We know from several passages of Scripture that this is part of God's purpose for maintaining a relative silence. For example, in Psalm 50:21-22 we read, "These things you have done, and I kept silence; you thought that I was just like you; I will reprove you, and state the case in order before your eyes." From these statements we come to see that God is not struggling desperately to gain man's attention. Actually He is restraining Himself in order to demonstrate to human beings something about our inner character, or tendency to evil. We might call this "the Sheriff in the tavern" principle--people tend to be good when they think they are being watched by an authority. If a sheriff wants to find out or reveal who the troublemakers are in a tavern, he must either hide or appear to be an ineffective wimp, otherwise the bad guys will behave as well as everyone else.
Of course we should not push this analogy too far: unlike the Sheriff, God doesn't need to see men's evil actions in order to accurately judge them. Moreover, He has not stated His full reasons for allowing men to demonstrate their evil intent through their actions. The point we are trying to make here is that there are reasons that we can understand that may explain to some degree why God has chosen to run the world the way He has.
Modern bibles are so full of holes it's ridiculous.
The whole there's evil therefore God doesn't exist or doesn't care, is a rubbish argument which holds no ground.
If your going to say God is malevolent/evil or some one you wouldn't want to whorship. Look no further than the old testament, rather than using silly arguments.
God exists only on Uranus. He lives up there.
Explain to me as an 'educated Christian' why god cannot reduce evil.
I don't know what you're trying to say here. Your sentences are very incorehent and poorly constructed, I'm afraid to say.
I'm not saying anything, other than trying to educate and get away from silly unfounded questions. I'm not a Christian or even religious.So you agree he's malevolent? Or are you just going to say that part of the bible can't be trusted?
I'm not saying anything, other than trying to educate and get away from silly unfounded questions. I'm not a Christian or even religious.
I have always wondered why christians think that their specific bible is the right one, not only has soceity changed a lot in 2000 years, I can imagine the bible has as well. Hand copying is only so accurate and relies on people to trust.
they don;t which is why many study variuse ones and even go back to the "originals" and compare and decide for themselfs.Also how do you know the translation is right/ wrong?
I have another quick question, why did God take so long ( 1 day/1 period of time) to create the earth while he managed to create the universe in that same period.Also if more life was found, what would it mean for you?
Why are you defending some body elses position if you are not a Christian?
EDIT: You were posting earlier as if you were a christian. Disregard previous post.
The Bible does not explain everything, if it did it would be huge
I'm not saying anything, other than trying to educate and get away from silly unfounded questions. I'm not a Christian or even religious.
Well that's his fault see, I can fit millions of bibles onto my usb stick. Should have used one of them instead of those clumsy paper things