They'll be back onto staffies soon enough once the dogs of peace are banned.They seem to be mostly owned by aggressive chav types.
They'll be back onto staffies soon enough once the dogs of peace are banned.They seem to be mostly owned by aggressive chav types.
there a status animal in the chav world ... and with most chavs off there nut most of the time ..the dogs aren't taught control .. most mastiffs are very loving dogs and are protective of there owners but they do need socializing and training .. bullys i don't know about never had one .. my hardest dog to train was a Rhodesian ridgeback female which in the end went back to the breeder ..They seem to be mostly owned by aggressive chav types.
Police shot this one.
There are rumours from people in the area that the man who died had a problem with the owner breeding these dogs and has thrown a brick through the window and then the male XL Bully either escaped through said window or was set upon him by the owner.
It's hard to see how the owner could have been arrested for murder if there was provocation. Although I suppose you can't turn your dog on someone as a weapon, regardless of whether your property has been damaged.
That's a great idea to take them to a private field.every single dog owner should be liable for there dog ..i have 2 french mastiffs both are rescues they don't like small dogs .. so we take them to a private field 3 times a week so they can run about ..some times my daughters dogs come as well again mastiffs ..
and they happily play together .. there needs to be a national register ..no back street kennels no making a quick quid for all dogs .. i'd be happy to have mine on it .. there good take commands well .. but lacking in recall hence the field and if we do walk them ..halti's and vests .. for control
Completely agree. Complete responsibility for the actions of a dog or other pet should be with its owner.Maybe if each dog attack was treated as attempted murder (or murder if the worse was to happen) then people would think twice about having them.
One country (can't remember which) now requires all dogs to be on a DNA database. So that if someone doesn't clear up the poop, they can be traced and fined. We need that too.
Maybe if each dog attack was treated as attempted murder (or murder if the worse was to happen) then people would think twice about having them.
Wouldn't fancy the job title - dog poo sampler.
Maybe we should lobotomise these things. I was reading we could have 60-70,000 of these things, how many are in the hands of clowns prepared to set them on people over a dispute and smashed window.
We can’t have another decade of this waiting for these dogs to die out.
Strange how it's definitely the owners but it's always the same breed of dog.
I didn't know what a Presa Canario was so I googled it and
You don't cross a Presa Canario with an XLBully unless you intend to take down Bears with that thing. Who in their right mind have something like that as a pet? It's insane!
Strange how it's definitely the owners but it's always the same breed of dog.
I'd give more 'respecc' to a chav with a Yorkie than any beast style dog.
Why do people aspire to, or even be oblivious to the stereotype? Be original, break the mold, be a smart, sophisticated chav with a daschund. Who cares what the lads on the next estate think. You're you, an individual, a trend setter. Chose life. Chose a chihuahua.
Rather than banning / euthanizing "Dangerous Breeds" perhaps the solution would be to ban / euthanize the Chav's using them like a weapon.![]()