Where? You've been asked twice now and both times your replies contain no stats/no citations at all.
If you're going to make an argument/claim and someone asks you to back up the claim and you can't then...
Last edited:
Does something need to be done about dogs?
- Thread starter Dis86
- Start date
Where? You've been asked twice now and both times your replies contain no stats/no citations at all.
If you're going to make an argument/claim and someone asks you to back up the claim and you can't then...
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,491
LOL - They're your own words you're taking issue with, mate....!!!
You've gotten so caught up in trying to play out your limited range of logical argument tactics that you've tied yourself up in knots. No wonder 'it seems' like 'you're confused' all the time!!
Which words? I'll ask you for a third time - can you quote whatever it is you're referring to, you made a claim re: some stats - what exactly are you referring to? If it's some stats you're claiming I've posted then just quote the post.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,491
And for a third time...
Go on, let's see you bury your head in the sand again.
Right.. so which stats are you referring to then?
You've replied several times now and each time you don't seem to be able to provide these stats you're making claims about.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,491
Same ones you were, hence quoting you...
They're your ******* stats, kiddo.... I don't see why *I* should have to provide the sources upon which your argument hinges.
Besides, we already hashed this out earlier in the thread. If you really want to see the evidence of your own stats, go get 'em yourself.
So you agree you were wrong, this is what I posted:
As you can see the chart clearly shows pitbull types disproportionately killing people, shows nothing about any mongrels having a higher portion of attacks... mixed breeds are 17 there vs 284 for pitbulls. That data doesn't support your claim at all!
It seems you are indeed confused, if not then back up your claim, what stats are you referring to? If you're just going to say the ones I posted then you're clearly wrong and that don't support your claim.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,491
No, I was not wrong. You just didn't read what was written.
Which is what I did write, hence making fun of you saying the same thing in response, because again you didn't read properly....
You had one earlier in the thread which included admissions to hospital (non-fatal attacks), back when we were talking about severity of injuries and misidentification of breeds. It had GSDs and Rottweilers above Staffies, with PBTs around the 5th position.
You were trying to use that to argue that APBTs were so much more risky because their lower rate of attacks were more likely to be fatal. I'm now using your same argument to reiterate the point that dogs other than the XLB attack more often and are more likely to cause serious injury.
You are wrong as the stats don't back what you claimed, they show exactly what I stated. If you're refering to some other stats then post them...
Can't see any quotes or statistics yet... If you're going to refer to an argument you claim I've made then quote it, if you're going to refer to some statistics then cite whatever stats you're refering to.
Can't see any quotes or statistics yet... If you're going to refer to an argument you claim I've made then quote it, if you're going to refer to some statistics then cite whatever stats you're refering to.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,491
Which is exactly the same as I stated.
Could you be any more obtuse?
If you're going to take issue with your own sources being brought up and challenged, especially over something already discussed, it's up to you to check your own assertions based on them. I'm also not going to spoonfeed you like some petulant child, as you've already said you don't read my posts properly anyway.
interesting chart, seems pit bulls and rottweilers should jsut be bannedSo you agree you were wrong, this is what I posted:
As you can see the chart clearly shows pitbull types disproportionately killing people, shows nothing about any mongrels having a higher portion of attacks... mixed breeds are 17 there vs 284 for pitbulls. That data doesn't support your claim at all!
It seems you are indeed confused, if not then back up your claim, what stats are you referring to? If you're just going to say the ones I posted then you're clearly wrong and that don't support your claim.
The source I cited backs up what I said and there's nothing on there about mongrels attacking more people. If you're going to make a claim then back it up, that you're sperging out but still can't support your claim with anything says it all. Instead of throwing in insults just back up your claim, each time you reply it's just more angry ranting and no substance.
What year are these stats you can't even cite from?
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 4,597
- Location
- Telford
Grandma mauled to death by two 'unregistered XL Bullies' in front of grandson
A GRANDMA was mauled to death by two allegedly unregistered XL Bullies in front of her “traumatised” grandson, her family have said. Cops raced to a home in Jaywick, Essex, shortly afte…
www.thesun.co.uk
XL bullies reported here, no matter what the breed, horrible way to go
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2019
- Posts
- 585
So you agree you were wrong, this is what I posted:
I have two on that list, boxer and GSD! By nature they are big dogs, if you are a responsible owner and regularly exercise your dogs and socialise them I can't ever see mine hurting someone. Lock them up in a house 24/7 and neglect them, can see how they would snap or be extremely nervous if they escaped.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,639
Very weird article, as they quote 'XL Bullies' and then have a picture of a random German Shepherd and then go on to state:Grandma mauled to death by two 'unregistered XL Bullies' in front of grandson
A GRANDMA was mauled to death by two allegedly unregistered XL Bullies in front of her “traumatised” grandson, her family have said. Cops raced to a home in Jaywick, Essex, shortly afte…
XL bullies reported here, no matter what the breed, horrible way to go
Last edited:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ld-man-suspicion-dangerous-dogs-offences.html
"The police said the breeds are yet to be determined, but the family have claimed they were XL Bully dogs."
"She said her mother - from Woodford Green, London - had previously told the dogs' owner that they were dangerous."
"told MailOnline: 'They were XL Bullies. There were eight of them in the house, six puppies and two adults. None of them neutered, not registered."
"'The owner's words were "no one is going to tell me what to do with my own **** dogs."" - Mods: direct quote from paper, apologies.
"'Mum had raised concerns about the dogs, over their breed and their temperament. ""
Scum of the earth breeding dangerous dogs.
Perfect example of why a ban on the breeding of them has been put in place.
Now if only we can put a ban on breeding on humans with alarming social skills or lack of IQ.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,639
It's Jaywick, one of the worst places in the country.
I'm not surprised they would be flouting the ban.
I know, I live near it.
Other parts of Essex trying to catch up with being voted worst in the county.
Either way, I think its clear they are XL Bullys based on amount of comments and info from others.