You just see the videos i posted. GTX 980 TI OC is 25% faster on 1440p and 1080p with same settings.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Doom Vulkan vs Open GL performance
- Thread starter Doom112
- Start date
You just see the videos i posted. GTX 980 TI OC is 25% faster on 1440p and 1080p with same settings.
Associate
thank you for posting this, decent performance and it does show what most people are talking about.
AMD cards perform admirably well, no one is denying this but still far away from 1080. Now hopefully we can put this to rest and enjoy our games. 100+ fps is more than playable in my eyes.
I benchmark similar to this and again GTX 980 Ti is some what 20% faster. However, shadow play takes 10% of performance while recording.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNZby5eF2kM&feature=youtu.be
Soldato
They did the same with DX11 and Vista so nothing new and will remain the same for as long as possible.
Honestly people not moving onto the latest software is half the reason it is just this bad now. There is a reason that Apple push out all OS updates and you have no choice there.
Vulkan would be great if we actually had an alternative gaming OS that was any good but it's the horse before he cart scenario. No one is really developing a good quality gaming OS that has basic PC functions still that means Vulkan would be first choice and Vulkan won't be pushed enough because most game on Windows which will push people to DX12 in the mid term.
That means games such as Doom on Vulkan so far are likely to be rare until the Devs understand what is best and how to make things work. ID Tech have always flipped a finger at DX so will likely be that it is Vulkan only in the future with games built ground up for it.
Although Frostbite and Unreal will run Vulkan I don't imagine they will be dropping DX12 which will be their primary first with Vulkan support added later.
Quickly glancing at your FPS its about as fast as my OC 290. Maybe 10fps ahead.
AH never mind ur running at 1440p.
But yes, you can gain on Nvidia cards running Vulkan if you're CPU limited.
Last edited:
Soldato
Something not right there. I am getting far superior performance to that FuryX in that video with a FuryPro. I'd also like to see 1440p, since I believe Nvidia hardware are seeing gains in 1080p only on high end cards due to cpu bottlenecks.
Is this true computerbase are using still frames as benchmark results? Where has this been documented?
game engine with Vulkan build would force a better dx12 along the way also.
patching is ok but to really make the best need game engines.
hopefully dice dont screw up that with Bf1
Because both are getting hit in performance due to recording ,which is around 10%. I do not remember but i think it was Mirror Edge 2 benchmark ,which they did around 20 secs of benchmark for each card.
However, unlike all websites computerbase never tells or show how or where they did the benchmark ,which makes their benchmark quiet irrelevant .
Last edited:
Associate
yes triple buffering is great
I still do not understand why M$ DX scraped this or was it only ever a OPEN GL feature
Soldato
So it hasn't been documented then?
Soldato
Loving the flipflop with bench sites, it's only valid when your team wins.
Yeah good post(s) and much more accurate than most people - though I'd slightly disagree on a couple of points - it is possible to get gains from Maxwell - just takes a lot more thought and depends more on the nature of the workload compared to GCN which you can load up far more indiscriminately - as he/she said you are over-riding the architecture's native functionality to a degree so you really need to know how the card works with Maxwell to know if doing things differently will have a benefit. Which kind of explains the delay in support with Doom.
Last edited:
Soldato
Loving the flipflop with bench sites, it's only valid when your team wins.
Not exactly. If people are going to make claims about testing methods they should know by now on this site you'll be pulled up about it for not providing a source
Not exactly. If people are going to make claims about testing methods they should know by now on this site you'll be pulled up about it for not providing a source
I do not know ,however, i tried to lower my clocks of GTX 980 Ti and memory but still i cannot reach the lower performance of Computerbase.
You can make a video and i will post it with the same method as yours to prove that Computerbase benchmark is totally BS like they did with Mirror Edge 2.
Soldato
Sure. Out of curiosity do you get an increase at 1440p and 4k as well with Vulkan?
Also Gregster if your out there I wouldn't mind if you tried again at 1080p, even if your gtx 1080 will be too strong for the game at the res I'm pretty sure you will get higher fps.
Last edited:
Yes i do ,however, one thing i put on note is that on SMAA i lose around 10% of performance compare to TSSAA on Vulkan.
Soldato
How much more roughly? I'm getting some nice gains across the board. I warn you the Fury is going to be tough to beat at 1440p and 4k
.Edit: Btw with AMD cards you need TSSAA for Vulkan to work so maybe that's your problem too.
How much more roughly? I'm getting some nice gains across the board. I warn you the Fury is going to be tough to beat at 1440p and 4k
Edit: Btw with AMD cards you need TSSAA for Vulkan to work so maybe that's your problem too.
Max is around 15% on 1440p and on 1080p it is like 20% max.
Permabanned
I'm more bothered by how they try to use it for the store and how closed of the store and it's games are, For example access to game files is blocked and access to the games by 3rd party programs isn't possible, along with how they seem to want to minimize how much control we have within the games settings.
I quite like Win 10, It's certainly better than Win 8 in my opinion and a lot closer to Win 7 in that it is relatively easy to live with. I have had issues getting the store to work but it turned out they where due more to there attempts to create it's own little eco system more than anything else as already addressed.
As a rule I will buy my games elsewhere when the option is there but as I did recently when buying Gears of war in the store's summer sale I won't stop myself from getting the games I really want because of there only being available there..