What is it with peoples ability to read things properly? Do you understand what a sentence is and why chopping it up like you've done would be considered quoting something out of context? Or is it when i said "and no different than dumping a ferry full of people on "the other side" en masse at Le Havre or any other port" that because that didn't fit the car narrative thing you've just plucked out of your backside you thought you'd chop that part off.
Man alive the level of peoples reading skills in GD is awful, what part of "every other border crossing in the entire world" was it that you didn't understand? frequency, travel time, and any other guff doesn't apply because there's examples all around the world of crossings being more frequent, travel time being less, cars & lorries & even trains crossing border.
Seriously it's not rocket science, why people think just because it's the Dover Calais border crossing that it's somehow special is dumb. If French/English border officials didn't have to travel across the border to do their job they'd have to do it in their own country and if they screwed that up then the repercussions for that would be on them not on the country that they travelled to, juxtaposed controls was a dumb idea when it was signed in 1991/93 and it's an even dumber idea now we've left the EU.
Who said anything about the complexity of doing something? I mean it's pretty simple for me pee all over the floor but i don't, just because something's simple it doesn't mean it's the right or even best thing to do.
If the French, or English for that matter, want to start checking who's about to turn up at their border on an incoming train or ferry then fine but if they don't do those checks in a timely manner then the consequences should be on them, it should be down to them to deal with the queues of whatever waiting to be given the green light to enter the country just like it is at every other border crossing in the entire world. There should be nothing stopping people from leaving a country.
