Caporegime
I admire your ambition, misplaced as it is.
[TW]Fox;17210833 said:Shock as TangoSixteen posts more rubbish
Well yes, obviously.
You are at point A.
Ambulance is at point B.
You must travel A-->B.
Ambulance must travel B-->A-->B.
I regularly drive after a pint with colleagues on Friday lunch times. Maybe it makes me 0.1% more likely to have an incident but so does having a bad night's sleep or changing the track on my radio.
I believe that the problem with the idea of "zero tolerance" is that there are certain conditions that can result in a very small positive reading?
However, I do agree that when driving, you should do everything possible to ensure that you do not have ANY alcohol in your system - that seems a much safer and responsible approach - i.e. if you drink alcohol (or take drugs come to that) - don't drive.
Evenin' all.
Well I have to make some assumptions, or should I list every potential scenario?
I believe that the problem with the idea of "zero tolerance" is that there are certain conditions that can result in a very small positive reading?
No, but your assumptions are nonsense in the first place. Unless you happen to know where your nearest ambulance station is relative to your nearest hospital, as well as privy to the location of every ambulance, RRV and community responder, you can't just assume that waiting times between treatment would be the same either way. The only reason you've done so is because not doing so would destroy your argument in the first place.
No, but your assumptions are nonsense in the first place. Unless you happen to know where your nearest ambulance station is relative to your nearest hospital, as well as privy to the location of every ambulance, RRV and community responder, you can't just assume that waiting times between treatment would be the same either way. The only reason you've done so is because not doing so would destroy your argument in the first place.
The rather easy counter-argument to that is that ambulances, community responders etc could be further away than the nearest hospital thereby increasing their response time. Or they could all be busy. Or several other scenarios. Which then ruins your argument.
I refuse to have even one drink and drive, I'm sure there's many on here who have lost a friend/loved one due to drink-driving.
Do you think he had a half or a whole pint?
Anybody ever been caught
are you retarded????
I believe that the problem with the idea of "zero tolerance" is that there are certain conditions that can result in a very small positive reading?
However, I do agree that when driving, you should do everything possible to ensure that you do not have ANY alcohol in your system - that seems a much safer and responsible approach - i.e. if you drink alcohol (or take drugs come to that) - don't drive.
Evenin' all.