Dyslexia

Aha - got you. Your tactic clearly did wonders!

Well i gues people claiming im just lazy is better then people claiming everything im saying is wrong becuse I spell perfectly. Either way, they are on a forum. I don't really care if they think my spelling is just down to lazyness lol.
 
Dave you have already clearly stated your poor spelling is down to laziness and not dyslexia. Lets not try and pull the wool over peoples eyes who haven't read every post.
 
Im sorry but thats rubbish. I have to pay to prove im dyslexic. It costs around £200. So don't give me that.

You think we all get free laptops. Maybe you shouldget your factors straight. The only peoeple eligable for a free laptop are those so dislexic that when they write its all over the place and not possibel to read. Without a laptop they would fail all their academic studies becuase they cannot make notes. Litraly cannot.

Your twisting the truth because you don't know how it actually works.

Hang on a minute, you're dismissing my post as rubbish and then trying to argue against a point I've not even made. I'm not really interested in the irrelevant details, but FWIW I've not said you all get free laptops and I really couldn't care less that you've paid £200 for one of any number of different inconsistent tests in order to give yourself a label.

The fact is people who supposedly have 'Dyslexia' do have extra resources devoted towards them in education and get an unfair advantage in examinations. What I'm trying to point out is that a) its not even really clear what constitutes 'Dyslexia'/how to test for it/whether it even exists and b) that devoting extra resources to people who fit some special ill defined criteria is perhaps a bit unfair on other school kids/students who struggle in a similar area but don't fit the 'correct' ill defined attributes for it to be labeled as a particular condition.
 
Dave you have already clearly stated your poor spelling is down to laziness and not dyslexia. Lets not try and pull the wool over peoples eyes who haven't read every post.

Ahh - thanks for that. :)

Unforunetly hes wrong i never did. It was when i said i had a spellchecker and wasn't using it. But he clearly never read the reply to his dumb post so ill give it to him again. Which is ironic considering he was saying i was trying to pall the wool of people eyes who havn't read all the posts. Appears he nver did either.

If you click on the post to see the quote that is missing says:

"Quote:
Why don't you use a dictionary on your browser out of interest?

O i do, i just cant be bothered in correcting them in a convisation of if dyslexia exists. "

The point that ive already disgused with many people already. So quite franklyblackbadger, your talking crap.

(in reply to http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14703776&postcount=216)

I find it more amusing that Bigdave has already admitted that his appalling spelling is not down to dyslexia but pure laziness. It seams others have jumped on the bandwagon too.



Also If you think extra time in exams should be given.
Should fat people be given free goals in sports ? Should they also only have to run the 100m in 75m ?

Dyslexia is a contagious condition, for the same reasons it is often considered hereditary.

Im sorry how is this proof? The fact i said that i dont want to correct my spelling mistakes by using a spell checker (DIFFERNT TO A DICTIONARY) in this. The spell checker is highlighting my mistakes. I CANNOT SEE THEM MY SELF WITHOUT IT TELLING ME THERE IS A MISTAKE. If i could i wouldn't be dyslexic. Furhter more if you want me to use a dictionary in my exams then you need to give me 100% extra time probably.

You fail.


--------

You already know my reason for desiding not to use my spell checker in this thread. He is however as many people in this thread, incompetent.
 
Last edited:
Hang on a minute, you're dismissing my post as rubbish and then trying to argue against a point I've not even made. I'm not really interested in the irrelevant details, but FWIW I've not said you all get free laptops and I really couldn't care less that you've paid £200 for one of any number of different inconsistent tests in order to give yourself a label.

The fact is people who supposedly have 'Dyslexia' do have extra resources devoted towards them in education and get an unfair advantage in examinations. What I'm trying to point out is that a) its not even really clear what constitutes 'Dyslexia'/how to test for it/whether it even exists and b) that devoting extra resources to people who fit some special ill defined criteria is perhaps a bit unfair on other school kids/students who struggle in a similar area but don't fit the 'correct' ill defined attributes for it to be labeled as a particular condition.

When you are intelegent and your being held back because you can't answer more then 60% of the paper while going quickly becuse you run out of time. You need extra help to get the qualifications.

In the real world i dont have to answer a series of questions in a specified amount of time. Just in these examinations which do not lend well to dyslexics.

Your not understanding how it affects how slow you go through an exam if you have these problems.
 
The cynical side of me says a few people on this thread might be misspelling words deliberately, in order to try and convince the readers that they are genuinely dyslexic.

I often make mistakes in my posts and usually ninja edit them out, but due to the title of this thread I don't see the point tbh. (Only made one error in an earlier post that I can see as I usually read through my posts numerous times before posting the thing).

Generally I've given up trying to argue with some of the morons posting in this thread who aren't dyslexic, don't understand it, so they think that it can't exist. That must be true yeah, try jumping off a building saying mavity doesn't exist... :rolleyes:
 
Far from it, I clearly know you more than you.

It's no co-incidence that the people who refute the reading of books are the ones struggling. It's natural to avoid what we find difficult to deal with.

You know nothing.
You still think it's all about reading words.

Both my housemates took the test just to get a load of free stuff. They probably failed it on purpose. Both of them are very good at writing.

nothing wrong with them :rolleyes:

You can't cheat the tests.
In my department a member of my team is a dyslexia tester and she says with everything that she knows it would be impossible to cheat.

The only help my daughter received through high school + college was that she wasn't asked to read something out loud, she's allowed to write in blue and when she asked how to spell something the lecturer had to tell her without arguing about it.
What none of doubters can comprehend is that she has lost a lot of her childhood because she would be sitting in front of a PC + books trying to piece everything together to make sense.
She would quite often sit there from 5pm until 1am doing work which a 'normal' person would take 2 hours.
She wanted to carry on like this but the Uni/College said she wouldn't cope at Uni so asked her to do the tests which took ages.
The 28 page report is quite sad and bought tears to my eyes.

However, I do agree with Dirtydog's comments about employers taking on dyslexic's.
In such a cut-throat society why should she be allowed 25% extra time over a 'normal' person?
Why should her works PC have Dragon Naturally Speaking, Inspiration and other software installed?
Why should she be allowed a scanner with OCR and convert to MP3 capabilities?
If somebody sat next to me and were allowed 25% extra time to complete I'd be pretty miffed unless they worked 10 hours to my 8 hours and didn't get paid any extra.
 
I often make mistakes in my posts and usually ninja edit them out, but due to the title of this thread I don't see the point tbh. (Only made one error in an earlier post that I can see as I usually read through my posts numerous times before posting the thing).

Generally I've given up trying to argue with some of the morons posting in this thread who aren't dyslexic, don't understand it, so they think that it can't exist. That must be true yeah, try jumping off a building saying mavity doesn't exist... :rolleyes:

Yeah im now giving up, i see no more reason to talk to such incompetent people. It simply astounds me.
 
Thanks to the people who have helped with my original question
It seems the thread it now just arguments about if dyslexia is real or not, and then just abuse.
Some people's attitudes are just shocking
 
You know nothing.
You still think it's all about reading words.



You can't cheat the tests.
In my department a member of my team is a dyslexia tester and she says with everything that she knows it would be impossible to cheat.

The only help my daughter received through high school + college was that she wasn't asked to read something out loud, she's allowed to write in blue and when she asked how to spell something the lecturer had to tell her without arguing about it.
What none of doubters can comprehend is that she has lost a lot of her childhood because she would be sitting in front of a PC + books trying to piece everything together to make sense.
She would quite often sit there from 5pm until 1am doing work which a 'normal' person would take 2 hours.
She wanted to carry on like this but the Uni/College said she wouldn't cope at Uni so asked her to do the tests which took ages.
The 28 page report is quite sad and bought tears to my eyes.

However, I do agree with Dirtydog's comments about employers taking on dyslexic's.
In such a cut-throat society why should she be allowed 25% extra time over a 'normal' person?
Why should her works PC have Dragon Naturally Speaking, Inspiration and other software installed?
Why should she be allowed a scanner with OCR and convert to MP3 capabilities?
If somebody sat next to me and were allowed 25% extra time to complete I'd be pretty miffed unless they worked 10 hours to my 8 hours and didn't get paid any extra.

Both of them have clearly demonstrated they talk out their arse. Their ego is to great to go back on what they said, so no matter how logical and factual an arguement you could put forward there is simply no point.

Blackbadgers attack on me though really was dumbly proposed.
 
Thanks to the people who have helped with my original question
It seems the thread it now just arguments about if dyslexia is real or not, and then just abuse.
Some people's attitudes are just shocking

Just make sure you pay to get writen up documents stating the medical condition. Then it will be accepted everywhere. Uni's don't accept it unless its in a certain form it seems.
 
Thanks to the people who have helped with my original question
It seems the thread it now just arguments about if dyslexia is real or not, and then just abuse.
Some people's attitudes are just shocking

I'm equally shocked. It's just so plain to see when someone is dyslexic. It's interesting though, if some of the views in here where uttered in the organization I work for, it'd be a serious disciplinary offence. Typical as it's on the internet the clueless come out to attack others in a way they'd never do in the real world - what's that called again - cowardice
 
Thanks to the people who have helped with my original question
It seems the thread it now just arguments about if dyslexia is real or not, and then just abuse.
Some people's attitudes are just shocking

I Just came home myself from work to find what has happend to this appalling thread.

I'm quite suprised that this thread hasn't been locked.
 
Thought some of the intelligent debaters might appreciate what a bit of a 28 dyslexia report looks like -

dyslexia1.jpg


dyslexia2.jpg


dyslexia3.jpg


dyslexia4.jpg
 
Thought some of the intelligent debaters might appreciate what a bit of a 28 dyslexia report looks like -

snip

Unfortunately its the intelligent ones that arn't doubting the existance.

After the 20th when i find out my results im going to be going and getting a new report ready for uni.
 
Back
Top Bottom