EDL March Against New Mosque That Turned Out To Be A KFC Cost Police £500,000

Correct. Faith is belief without evidence. The default position of a rational mind is to reject all claims until we have sufficient evidence to believe them.

Faith isn't incompatible with reason, in fact belief should be measured and balanced with a degree of both, this is true in all things not only religion.
 
Well it does have the knack of killing all social, economic, moral and scientific progress in every country it infects. With trillions in oil revenue they should be economic superpowers, except they aren't. One is a fancy Butlins, the rest are busy plotting to destroy Israel.
I'm not saying anything, history does that for me, that and **** all Nobel prizes from any of them.


History doesn't tell you that, that is simply your interpretation given a limited knowledge of history. Given that Islam has been around for over 1500 years and during the majority of that time the Middle East been one of the more stable and civilised regions, what history tells us is that the impact of colonialism, imperial expansion, dismantling societies and the imposition of governments and political impropriety has created a fractured and largely dysfunctional region since the collapse and dismantlement of the Ottoman Empire.

Pretty much all of the IRA groups have what they want, the rest will be dead in 20 years.
There is no getting rid of Islamists.

Shame they don't seem to agree with you.
 
The Middle East was the forefront of mathematics, astrology and science a thousand years ago.

It is undeniable that the propagation of Islam at that time not only halted but reversed what was at the time the most progressive and scientific civilization on Earth.

I think you really need to check your history there.
 
what history tells us is that the impact of colonialism, imperial expansion, dismantling societies and the imposition of governments and political impropriety has created a fractured and largely dysfunctional region since the collapse and dismantlement of the Ottoman Empire.
Which is the period I'm referring too, it's partly because islam is incompatible with everyone else that they get dumped on.

Shame they don't seem to agree with you.
They can't argue about being dead in 20 years.

I think you really need to check your history there.
His point is correct I think, I found the same info from a history research paper.
Basically you can't make a curious scientific society out of a backward repressive one. Africa makes more progress than some of these countries.
 
The Middle East was the forefront of mathematics, astrology and science a thousand years ago.

It is undeniable that the propagation of Islam at that time not only halted but reversed what was at the time the most progressive and scientific civilization on Earth.

You've got it completely the wrong way around. The propagation of Islam was the main reason for the Middle East's golden age. In fact, it's widely called 'The Islamic Golden Age'. The building of the Islamic empire brought a diverse group of thinkers together under one language. That's why the Middle East raced ahead of Europe.

Pathfinders by Prof. Jim Al-Khalili is worth a read if you'd like to find out more.
 
Last edited:
You've got it completely the wrong way around. The propagation of Islam was the main reason for the Middle East's golden age. In fact, it's widely called 'The Islamic Golden Age'. The building of the Islamic empire brought a diverse group of thinkers together under one language. That's why the Middle East raced ahead of Europe.

Raced ahead in what sense?

In many respects, they raced backwards as they blindly embraced Latin and Greek thinking, which we know to have been flawed in many regards. Medicine is a good example.
 
That's an appeal to expertise if I have ever seen one.

I'm not arrogant enough to presume I'm an expert, but theology is a hobby of mine per say and I couldn't help throwing in the fact that this is a subject I spend a lot of time with. There's nothing wrong with promulgating epistemic 'credentials' in my opinion.
 
Raced ahead in what sense?

In many respects, they raced backwards as they blindly embraced Latin and Greek thinking, which we know to have been flawed in many regards. Medicine is a good example.

Raced ahead in the sense that their knowledge of science, mathematics and medicine was way ahead of Europe at the time.

They certainly did not follow Latin and Greek thinking blindly. People like Alhzen were using modern scientific methodology hundreds of years before the likes of Newton.

It's no coincidence that most of the words that we draw from Arabic, such as algebra and chemistry, are scientific words.
 
No I live in a rather white area, there is definitely not a mosque local either and I don't know any Muslims. According to the census the Muslim population is 4.4%, it's 1.5% in Wales, I can't see them taking over with those numbers.

You and your rational thoughts are going to get you in trouble round here :D

This thread was never going to end well with it's title but it sure was painful to read.
 
There's nothing wrong with promulgating epistemic 'credentials' in my opinion.

But we do have an expert (doctorate attaining) and a scientist (doctorate attained) who both are saying something very different to the hobbyists like yourself though. Neither of whom are making appeals to expertise.
 
Raced ahead in the sense that their knowledge of science, mathematics and medicine was way ahead of Europe at the time.

They certainly did not follow Latin and Greek thinking blindly. People like Alhzen were using modern scientific methodology hundreds of years before the likes of Newton.

It's no coincidence that most of the words that we draw from Arabic, such as algebra and chemistry, are scientific words.

I am not saying there was no Arabic innovation, what I am saying is that the level of innovation is overstated. Greek, Latin and Hindu works provided not only the cornerstone of the 'Golden Age', but the walls and roof too.

I am also saying that it's precisely because the Muslims embraced Greek and Latin knowledge so fully, that actually they didn't really progress that much in many respects. Medicine is one example, but this is true of most of the physical sciences.

And you're right, it's not coincidence. It's because the Muslims translated many ancient Greek and Latin works into Arabic. Most of the original works were lost, so when the knowledge reentered Europe, it came primarily from Arabic sources.
 
But we do have an expert (doctorate attaining) and a scientist (doctorate attained) who both are saying something very different to the hobbyists like yourself though. Neither of whom are making appeals to expertise.

Well having a doctorate doesn't mean you're right. Academia is full of competing opinions. That's why it's so interesting. Also I never made an appeal to expertise so stop implying that I did. All I said was I study the subject, and in a following post I even conceded I wasn't an expert. So please stop arguing dishonestly and making things up.
 
Back
Top Bottom