Elon Musk goes to court . . .

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
16 Jun 2005
Posts
24,055
Location
In the middle
Out of court settlements happen all the time even after court proceedings have started.

It's usually at a point where Musks lawyers will advise him that the court is likely to side with the diver and the damage penalty is X amount, less give him an out of court settlement of Y.

It's always about the money. I'm in two minds about the divers intentions. For one thing, good on him for showing that no matter how rich you are, you can't just make humiliating claims like he did. But on the other hand if he's doing it to make a quick buck, then all good intentions goes out the window. Hence i said i wonder if he's announced that he'll be donating all proceeds to a charity. As i suspect it'll likely be quite a sizeable sum.
IIRC all the diver wanted at the time was an apology, and Musk basically told him to do one.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Feb 2003
Posts
10,058
Location
Europe
Whatever you want to believe.

He is about to send astronauts on his rockets and about to embarrass NASA's new heavy rocket.

But couldn't anyone with some money hire a team of scientists and design/build some rockets if they really wanted to? I don't think embarrassing NASA is anything special. The Russian Space Agency did that for years when NASA were having to pay the Russians to send people into space.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jun 2005
Posts
3,073
Location
The South
But couldn't anyone with some money hire a team of scientists and design/build some rockets if they really wanted to?

Big difference between "some money" folk like Bezos and Branson, and Musk who has fair amount of knowledge of physics and aerospace engineering - you only have to look at his twitter feed and his interactions with other scientists/physicists/engineers to know that.

No argument that he's a bit of a ****-womble like in this case, but you can't say he's just a money man.

NASA seem to be more aware of how badly things can go wrong. So they take things slower.

Both NASA and private space companies are put under the same scrutiny, especially in terms of safety. Rather it's more down to the approach, i.e. - a private company can go for a more of a 'suck it and see' type of approach which leads to rapid development where as, a government ran agency is mostly tied up in red-tape and budget constraints so it takes vastly longer for anything to get signed off and built.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Feb 2003
Posts
10,058
Location
Europe
Big difference between "some money" folk like Bezos and Branson, and Musk who has fair amount of knowledge of physics and aerospace engineering - you only have to look at his twitter feed and his interactions with other scientists/physicists/engineers to know that.

No argument that he's a bit of a ****-womble like in this case, but you can't say he's just a money man.

No, of course, he does have a degree in Physics so will know enough to read the right research papers, have unique thoughts, and talk to the right people.

From what I read, the SpaceX rocket (and their competition Blue Origin) basically just updates Russia's now 30 year old RD-170 and RD-180 units using modern resources and using methane instead of kerosene for the pre-combustion.

NASA has put the rocket business up to tender since the use of Russian RD-180s will be banned come 2022.
 
Permabanned
Joined
28 Nov 2003
Posts
10,695
Location
Shropshire
Given some of the basic, really basic, design errors in Tesla cars I would suggest his no doubt impressive credentials have somehow failed to impact the finished products. One example is they had the inner rear constant velocity joint splines running dry inside the rear electric motor casings. The splines naturally wore prematurely given no lubrication (they'd be immersed in the differential oil in a normal axle casing) producing copious electrically conductive magnetic dust. High current electric motors do not like their internals covered in metallic dust, the failure rate was shocking. It's something I would expect a sixth form engineering student or a farmer to foresee...
 
Man of Honour
Joined
5 Dec 2003
Posts
21,004
Location
Just to the left of my PC
Are we forgetting the Cyber Truck with unsmashable glass?

I think the stunt with it dragging an F150 was an even better example of Muskism - deception and meaningless twaddle to create publicity(*).


* In case anyone is wondering, the stunt involved a heavier 4WD vehicle with all wheels loaded in a tug of war against a lighter RWD vehicle with the driven wheels unloaded. Of course the lighter RWD vehicle with unloaded wheels had far less traction than the 4WD vehicle with all wheels loaded, so of course it lost traction and was dragged. That's obvious to anyone with even the slightest smattering of relevant knowledge, but that doesn't matter when it comes to putting on a show for publicity. It's too deceptive to be allowed in a formal advert, but that can be avoided by not calling it an advert. I'm being generous and assuming that Musk didn't rig the show further by (for example) using different tyres.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,313
IIRC all the diver wanted at the time was an apology, and Musk basically told him to do one.

Seemed 6 to one, half a dozen to the other at the time - he seemed to dislike Musk just because he is Musk (same as some people in this thread) and said some not very pleasant things. I don't have much sympathy for either of them.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Feb 2007
Posts
14,109
Location
Leafy Cheshire
Seemed 6 to one, half a dozen to the other at the time - he seemed to dislike Musk just because he is Musk (same as some people in this thread) and said some not very pleasant things. I don't have much sympathy for either of them.

He told him to "stick your sub where it hurts" on TV during an interview, which seemed out of place and unnecessary. It probably could have culminated in any other mature adult saying "well that's not fair I'm only trying to help", but Musk went full tilt into calling him "paedo guy". What's weird is that he deleted it, then doubled down and said "only one reason for an old British guy to be Thailand". That kinda presents itself against Musk's defence today of "paedo guy just means creepy old man in South Africa".

The whole thing is ****** weird to be honest.

However unnecessary the diver was, though, it didn't deserve a hugely influential public figure making the kind of accusations that can ruin your life.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
32,755
To be fair, the US government has paid in to Musk's little Empire to the tune of billions, likely using it as a platform to fool private investors. The fact that he ran to the Saudi's not too long ago to take his Tesla private was deeply suspect, before he had to shelve it over fallout from the Khashoggi murder and the damage that connection would have done from other investors/public sentiment.

Indeed recently the Saudi's have taken most of their exposure out of Tesla instead... He seems rather shotgun with all of his plans, if there's ever a more professional competitor, i think his empire will crumble.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
15 Feb 2003
Posts
10,058
Location
Europe
i think his empire will crumble.

Empire? The only thing he owns is SpaceX which is worth a pretty penny, but if it doesn't win the NASA rocket contract for 2022, it will likely lose some value.

He is the largest shareholder currently in Tesla, but that is only 20% so doesn't own it and could easily be kicked out if the other shareholders
 

TJM

TJM

Associate
Joined
10 Jun 2007
Posts
2,378
Musk was an interfering busybody and an actual rescuer didn't have time for his nonsense, which is the sort of attitude I'd want from someone in that position. I hope he wins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom