So they didn't make £1.12bn profit then? Or what?People love to jump on a headline. Ah well those EDF customers need to pay £40 each now by the logic applied earlier
So they didn't make £1.12bn profit then? Or what?People love to jump on a headline. Ah well those EDF customers need to pay £40 each now by the logic applied earlier
thank you for a thorough writeupenergy supply and demand is a very complex GLOBAL picture
So they didn't make £1.12bn profit then? Or what?
And who did the consumer business buy the gas from? Lol.the section of the business that supplies energy to end customers lost £200m because they had to buy energy at rates above what they were allowed to sell it for under the price cap.
Don’t forget not all the energy they sell to customers is electricity, it also includes gas. Likewise they have to buy the electricity at arms length of the open market with other suppliers.
The marketAnd who did the consumer business buy the gas from? Lol.
And who are the big players in the market?The market
The market
Vertically integrated doesn’t create loyalty. The energy will be purchased from whoever on the market offers the best price/contractAnd who are the big players in the market?
Imagine if I owned Weatabix, and a large percentage of the wheat fields.
Energy producers and suppliers don’t set the gas wholesale price .
-> The producers extract the gas and sell it at the market rates to the suppliers.
-> The suppliers sell it to us, plus 5% profit
Also, Centrica cannot sell the gas it extracts to its own company (British Gas) for a rate than is preferential to the one it charges other energy companies.
If I started a bakery.
I was able to make a loaf of bread for 20p.
I then set up a separate retailer to sell the bread to consumers.
My retailer purchased the bread from my bakery at £1 a loaf and sold it for £1.05.
Would you consider that ok? Only 5% profit right?
Energy producers and suppliers don’t set the gas wholesale price .
If I started a bakery.
I was able to make a loaf of bread for 20p.
I then set up a separate retailer to sell the bread to consumers.
My retailer purchased the bread from my bakery at £1 a loaf and sold it for £1.05.
Would you consider that ok? Only 5% profit right?
Label it what you want but corporate veil is a real thing.Bad example is bad.
"Set by the market" is such a cheap excuse.Read : From my post you quoted:
In your example : You are setting the price of the bread you are selling to the retailer - The energy producers aren't, it's set by the market! [and it's the same for all 'bakeries']
Same - lovely cheap day for gas at 5.99p per unit!jumped on the octopus variable for now... dropped from estimated 300ish month to 170ish so a good chunk. Obviously prices flactuate a lot with this so pros and cons. I've heard they've limited it to 50 new sign ups a day now. Wonder why..
“Can choose to sell for less”"Set by the market" is such a cheap excuse.
In high demand a seller can choose to sell for less. Set by the market becomes valid when your principle is "sell for high as you can get".
Now if the market is regulated forcing the cheaper producers to sell for the same price as the most expensive, then yeah, but in a free open market, no one has a gun to the sellers head saying you must maximise your profits.
That’s like a like an oil company making money on selling engine oil or trading energy and somehow that’s at the expense of uk utility customersI guess these energy companies must have made massive profits somewhere else entirely then. Maybe they own a bakery or something. Can't possibly be a correlation between high prices to consumers and their "other interests".
Or an oil company trading crude. Oh wait ...That’s like a like an oil company making money on selling engine oil or trading energy and somehow that’s at the expense of uk utility customers