Soldato
And they pay less towards it as a consequence.
Not necessarily. Commercial rates are often very low when renewables are at their highest output. Landowners in Scotland are paid a percentage of the wind farm profits or a fixed rent for their land, its not unsubstantial, the 'locals' would benefit more from seeing a share of this plus owning their own turbines rather than foreign governments and investors owning a lot of it.
Its a bit different because it was publicly owned, nobody had a choice. Now wind farms need the national grid to sell their energy as in most of these areas there isnt enough demand on the local grid and the turbines would have to the turned off more often.
Already been discussed though, the regions using more 'grid' are paying more for it.
Your being a bit obtuse here. Its been done to death.
Those using more grid seem to be paying a notional amount, when clearly the main reason we are upgrading the grid is because there is a massive gap between where its being generated and where its being used.
ALL the major grid works lead to L&SE in effect.
Again IMO its simple, the same model should be used for unit costs and network distribution. Lets fix it so it works for how the UK generates and uses and where the driver of those costs come from.
The model currently uses a mechanism for each that is more beneficial to L&SE.
Its really not hard, its literally the end result.
Plenty of solar farms in England now, it is changing with regards to nimbyism. But some of the old abandoned projects should be looked at again, plenty of space for more offshore wind down this way.
There are but again are they in L&SE? The largest in the UK (one that Labour gov green lit) is happening near me, was stuck in planning for years. Again its well away from the areas that have the largest energy deficits.
Its literally agreed to cause local disruption, even talk of closing or limiting access to the exit from the local A trunk road that I use in order to give priority to the works traffic.
Plus no matter how minor the large battery storage does come with some risk should* it catch fire.
* Unlike the virtually 100% its sure to burn down within days of going live that the local NIMBYs were claiming.