Soldato
It’s Great how we are all brainstorming ideas to fix this. Not even our own government is doing this
….
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/smile.gif)
This is an interesting chart - shows how vital correcting our energy system costs is.
![]()
NIMBY ********According to Google, total UK electricity consumption is 300,000 GWh. That is per year, so that would be 821 GWh per day or 34 GWh per hour (34 GW).
So at 20 GW of production from wind, that is 60% of our total energy needs.
(Correct my maths if its wrong.)
So surely we are close. It won't take much of a push now to get to full self reliance - then why should we be paying international rates.
There is plenty of space left - why isn't the Government just saying to everyone with capital - get on and build these damn things.
if we can go from 8 GW to 20 GW in 3 years, why can't we go to 30 GW, 40 GW in the same timeframe. Just get going! Like when the navvies built the canals.
Like I said a few days back, almost all of us here could do a better job than any of the people in charge of our big institutions.It’s Great how we are all brainstorming ideas to fix this. Not even our own government is doing this….
Population density....Heavily renewable Scandinavian countries have had slightly higher energy prices before all these rises kicked off and now have the lowest. Renewable can create energy independence.
government is like pushing on string. Its a universal rule people can always do better then a large blob like govLike I said a few days back, almost all of us here could do a better job than any of the people in charge of our big institutions.
I think your maths is correct.According to Google, total UK electricity consumption is 300,000 GWh. That is per year, so that would be 821 GWh per day or 34 GWh per hour (34 GW).
So at 20 GW of production from wind, that is 60% of our total energy needs.
(Correct my maths if its wrong.)
So surely we are close. It won't take much of a push now to get to full self reliance - then why should we be paying international rates.
There is plenty of space left - why isn't the Government just saying to everyone with capital - get on and build these damn things.
if we can go from 8 GW to 20 GW in 3 years, why can't we go to 30 GW, 40 GW in the same timeframe. Just get going! Like when the navvies built the canals.
Ideology.There is plenty of space left - why isn't the Government just saying to everyone with capital - get on and build these damn things.
Population density....
Not saying it can't be done, just it is too costly and will take too long, nuclear power is a 'quick' fixThat just means its easier for them to achieve it, lower population, means lower demand, and less generation required to meet those demands.
It would just require scaling up for larger populations. I remember there was a project I backed years ago on indigogo for solar roadways and while the task would be monumental to achieve, it would result in the country (America) being entirely powered through solar energy, infact they'd produce 3-4 times what they would need.
I think your maths is correct.
The problem is that the 20GW of wind power is the potential maximum. If there's no wind, there's no power. Currently (12:46pm) there's 0.71GW of total wind power being generated across the entire UK, which is about the lowest it has been for the past week.
As you say, increasing the capacity would help. If we had 40GW of potential maximum generation then even at 50% capacity they'd still be producing 20GW.
A decent way of storing the power would also help. Scotland produces the equivalent to almost 100% of total electrical usage from it's wind power. Sometimes that means there's no wind and other sources are required, sometimes the generation from wind is much higher than usage and the surplus gets sent to other places. Over a year it averages out that total generation from wind is almost exactly the same as total usage. If we had a good way of storing energy then it wouldn't take much at all for Scotland to be completely powered by renewables.
Nuclear failed because the cost was too high and all the suppliers pulled out. The French, then the Japanese, and finally we even went to the Chinese for our energy security, but they too pulled the plug.I will say this though. For years we've been held in hoc to a tiny minority of green zealots. It has always seemed sensible (and quite frankly, been obvious) that as we transition to a lower carbon economy, energy production via wind, solar and backed up by nuclear was the only practicable way to go in order to power a modern industrial economy. The fact we have'nt done this can be laid at the door of the tiny minority of aforementioned zealots as well as successive governments to scared to stand up to them. We need nuclear now - we should have been building it for the last 20 years.
It’s Great how we are all brainstorming ideas to fix this. Not even our own government is doing this….
Get real mate. Go to Anglesey where they're DESPERATE to have a new reactor built. The current Wylfa magnox unit has been providing jobs for decades.You can go back years on my posts, i've been saying it for almost a decade here, we need to be building Nuclear power stations, lots of them and **** the NIMBYs