Would we? What would the economic impact of leaving the EU be on us?
About the same as that time we didn't adopt the Euro.
Would we? What would the economic impact of leaving the EU be on us?
How do we know? Do we know that the rest of Europe would turn around and say "Right, fine we're not going to do business with you now"?
What about the rest of the world that isn't Europe - won't it be easier to do business with them?
Whilst it is largely impossible to tell exactly what will happen taking a common sense approach if we leave a trade union is that import/export taxes will be introduced as this is what happens when trading with people outside your nation/union.
...
I really don't understand why people think this is a good idea. It essentially means being part of an organisation bound by rules over which we surrender all control. The vast majority of rules agreed in the EU would continue to apply to us but we'd have no ability to control them. What's good about that?
D.The limits of the EEA
The EEA agreement does not establish binding provisions in all sectors of the internal market or in other policies under the EU Treaties. In particular, its binding provisions do not concern:
the common agricultural policy and the common fisheries policy (although the agreement contains provisions on trade in agricultural and fishery products);
the customs union;
the common trade policy;
the common foreign and security policy;
the field of justice and home affairs (although all the EFTA countries are part of the Schengen area); or
the economic and monetary union (EMU).
Snip
You don't seem to understand how it works, a massive amount of the money Wales receives from the UK goes on English things. To clarify we are energy sufficient 3-4 times over yet we are still building more power generation because England depends on us to subsidise it's grid, just like it depends on us to subsidise it's reservoir capacity, farmland, roads, etc.
To give one example of how the "spending per head" figures are a joke: We get given money by the UK treasury, some of that money then gets given to wind farm operators generating power for England in order to subsidise them, the reason they are subsidised is because the UK would have to pay the same anyway in fines for failing to meet targets on CO2 emissions, 90%+ of which is emitted by England.
And yet people like you whine that were overfunded when in reality we are grossly underfunded, because you only see the money, nothing else
What does make me cry though is the amount of ghost airports and motorways all around Europe. Funded by the EU. Hundreds of billions wasted. Ontop of that many airports that are in the red seeing through pitiful passenger numbers. Now this isn't a reason to leave the EU, it just highlights the mismanagment and ideology of the EU...
You neglect the fact that despite England getting the least spending per head, the money that England does get, the lions share goes to London. So guess what, everywhere else is virtually underfunded. To that effect the difference in spending per head is that much greater in some parts.
Scotland have also built lots of windmills as they have embraced the green economy and have applied for EU grants, why do they seem happy doing so and the Welsh aren't?
This caught my eye so I looked it up. Are you referring to the audit reported here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...6782/EU-wastes-airport-funding-worth-1bn.html
Interesting that the European Commission disagreed, saying "It is a completely unrepresentative sample of Europe’s airports". This could be true - they only looked at 20 airports. There are several hundred major airports in Europe, and several thousand including tiny ones.
Edit: Also the money's never really "wasted" - much of it will go back into the local economy for the labour and materials.
And lol - you can't claim that building an airport that no-one uses isn't a waste, I'm sorry.
Wales does apply for EU grants, a good percentage of the Fibre Optic roll-out in Wales is being funded by the EU.
Scotland have also built lots of windmills as they have embraced the green economy and have applied for EU grants, why do they seem happy doing so and the Welsh aren't?
Why?*
*not that I'm thinking there's a reason for them not to be, just wondering
They are willing to work harder for less pay?
This caught my eye so I looked it up. Are you referring to the audit reported here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...6782/EU-wastes-airport-funding-worth-1bn.html
Interesting that the European Commission disagreed, saying "It is a completely unrepresentative sample of Europe’s airports". This could be true - they only looked at 20 airports. There are several hundred major airports in Europe, and several thousand including tiny ones.
Edit: Also the money's never really "wasted" - much of it will go back into the local economy for the labour and materials.
You misunderstand, I am happy doing so, I have no problem helping England even when it means we end up underfunded because I like the UK, what I dislike is when people like you rant that we are being overfunded because you don't understand the money is going to subsidising you.
http://rt.com/business/214503-ghost-airports-europe/ - gives you a better feel for the real wastage. It doesn't even mention Ireland.
Then there are the motorways... more of the same. Expanding vast networks into 3/4 lane highways that simply do not get used.
It may not be 'wasted' as you would like to think the contracts are picked up by local building firms etc. But the the cost of maintenance sinks in. Employment? Well it's artificial... there wasn't actually any need for these jobs.
I disagree with it not being representitive. It's got nothing to do with that. It is the simple fact that they have spent billions on numerous airports that do not get used.
All the EU is is a mechanism for Germany and France to try and increase consumer base. Try to bring the poorer countries up to a similar standard of living as the big players. Then they can sell more of their high end products. Always destined to fail.